Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946893›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2018

[Planning target volume : Management of uncertainties, immobilization, image guided and adaptive radiation therapy].

A Schwahofer, O Jäkel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A SchwahoferAbteilung Medizinische Physik in der Strahlentherapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. a.schwahofer@dkfz.de.
O JäkelAbteilung Medizinische Physik in der Strahlentherapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueAs a standard, today's radiation therapy is based on CT images which are used for therapy planning. These images are obtained once before therapy starts and serve as a basis to obtain the position and shape of the target volume. As the patient has to be positioned anew for each fraction, deviations of the tumor position relative to the radiation field but also internal motion of the tumor may occur. These deviations lead to uncertainties, which are taken into account by adding a safety margin around the clinical target volume (CTV) to create the planning target volume (PTV). STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsAs a standard today, CT-based treatment planning is used, where images are obtained once prior to therapy. The information on tumor position and shape, which is obtained from these images, is used throughout the whole cycle of radiation therapy without any change. This cycle may last several weeks. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: By repeated imaging of the patient in the treatment position prior to each fraction, the position of the tumor can be assessed and corrected for each fraction. PERFORMANCE: A reduction of positioning uncertainty may be used to reduce the safety margin. This leads to a decreased volume of irradiated normal tissue. ACHIEVEMENTS: A reduced volume of irradiated normal tissue leads to reduced side effects and provides the opportunity of increased tumor control by dose escalation. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Before the PTV is reduced, a detailed analysis of the uncertainties for the specific imaging method and radiation technique must be performed.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansMotionRadiotherapy DosageUncertaintyImage-guided radiation therapyNormal tissue volumePlanning target volumeSafety marginsTumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.