Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946452›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2018

Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis - PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study.

Petra Baumann, Jongwon Kim, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Hyung-Ho Kim, Hoong-Yin Chong, Moritz N Wente

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02080702 (An International, Multicentric, Prospective, Observational Study to Evaluate Monosyn® Suture Material for Anastomoses in the Gastrointestinal Tract.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02080702 terminatednot on this map

An International, Multicentric, Prospective, Observational Study to Evaluate Monosyn® Suture Material for Anastomoses in the Gastrointestinal Tract.

TypeobservationalSponsorAesculap AGRan2014 to 2016Enrolled106ConditionsC.Surgical Procedure, Digestive System, Symptomatic Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Gastric Anastomosis (Site)ArmsMonosyn
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Petra BaumannAesculap AG, Medical Scientific Affairs, 78532, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Jongwon KimGangNam Severance Hospital, Department of Surgery, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Hoon AhnSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Department of Surgery, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Hyung-Ho KimSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Department of Surgery, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Hoong-Yin ChongUniversity Malaya Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Moritz N WenteAesculap AG, Medical Scientific Affairs, 78532, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeverance Hospital · KRUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVarious suture materials and suture techniques are used to perform gastrointestinal anastomosis after tumour resection, but the best combination is still a matter of debate.

methodsThis multi-centre, international, single-arm, prospective observational study aimed at demonstrating the non-inferiority of a mid-term absorbable monofilament in comparison to braided sutures in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Monosyn suture was used to create the gastrointestinal anastomosis and the frequency of anastomotic leakage until day of discharge was chosen as the primary parameter. The outcome was compared to the results published for braided sutures in the literature. Secondary parameters were the time to perform the anastomosis, length of hospital stay, costs, and postoperative complications.

resultsThe anastomosis leakage rate was 2.91%, indicating that Monosyn suture was not inferior to braided sutures used in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Of the reported anastomotic suture techniques, the single layer continuous method was the fastest and most economical technique in the present observational study.

conclusionMonosyn suture is safe and effective in gastrointestinal anastomosis and represents a good alternative to other sutures used for gastrointestinal anastomosis. With regard to safety, time and cost-efficiency, the single-layer continuous technique should be considered a preferred method. The transfer of results from clinical studies into daily practice with regard to surgical techniques for gastrointestinal anastomosis should be further evaluated in larger studies or in nationwide registries.

Indexed as

AnastomosisAnastomotic leakGastrointestinal tractMonofilament suture

Identifiers

PMID29946452
PMCPMC6016322
OpenAlexW2796247879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.