ReviewF1000Research2018
Recent advances in the detection of repeat expansions with short-read next-generation sequencing.
Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of repeat expansion variants using next generation sequencing: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Guideline
- Optical mapping reveals a higher level of large-scale structural variants in a family with paternally transmitted myotonic dystrophy and independent Parkinson's disease.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Loss-of-function variants in the CAPN1 activator CD99L2 cause X-linked spastic ataxia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating genome sequencing strategies: trio, singleton, and standard testing in rare disease diagnosis.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- First clinical diagnosis of FAME3 via commercial Long-Read sequencing reveals mosaic repeat expansion in MARCHF6 gene.Neurogenetics · 2025Article
- A prospective trial comparing programmable targeted long-read sequencing and short-read genome sequencing for genetic diagnosis of cerebellar ataxia.Genome research · 2025Article
- Tandem repeat disorders: from diagnosis to emerging therapeutic strategies.Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- STRchive: a dynamic resource detailing population-level and locus-specific insights at tandem repeat disease loci.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted long-read sequencing facilitates effective carrier screening for complex monogenic diseases including spinal muscular atrophy, α-/β-thalassemia, 21-hydroxylase deficiency, and fragile-X syndrome.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Get ready for short tandem repeats analysis using long reads-the challenges and the state of the art.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- The expanding diagnostic toolbox for rare genetic diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Automated Magnetic Bead-Based DNA Extraction for Detection of Short Tandem Repeat Expansions With Nanopore Sequencing.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- RExPRT: a machine learning tool to predict pathogenicity of tandem repeat loci.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Long read sequencing on its way to the routine diagnostics of genetic diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Article
- Spinocerebellar ataxia 27B: A novel, frequent and potentially treatable ataxia.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Review
- Rediscovering tandem repeat variation in schizophrenia: challenges and opportunities.Translational psychiatry · 2023Review
- Challenges facing repeat expansion identification, characterisation, and the pathway to discovery.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023Review
- Expanding horizons of tandem repeats in biology and medicine: Why 'genomic dark matter' matters.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short tandem repeats (STRs), also known as microsatellites, are commonly defined as consisting of tandemly repeated nucleotide motifs of 2-6 base pairs in length. STRs appear throughout the human genome, and about 239,000 are documented in the Simple Repeats Track available from the UCSC (University of California, Santa Cruz) genome browser. STRs vary in size, producing highly polymorphic markers commonly used as genetic markers. A small fraction of STRs (about 30 loci) have been associated with human disease whereby one or both alleles exceed an STR-specific threshold in size, leading to disease. Detection of repeat expansions is currently performed with polymerase chain reaction-based assays or with Southern blots for large expansions. The tests are expensive and time-consuming and are not always conclusive, leading to lengthy diagnostic journeys for patients, potentially including missed diagnoses. The advent of whole exome and whole genome sequencing has identified the genetic cause of many genetic disorders; however, analysis pipelines are focused primarily on the detection of short nucleotide variations and short insertions and deletions (indels). Until recently, repeat expansions, with the exception of the smallest expansion (SCA6), were not detectable in next-generation short-read sequencing datasets and would have been ignored in most analyses. In the last two years, four analysis methods with accompanying software (ExpansionHunter, exSTRa, STRetch, and TREDPARSE) have been released. Although a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance of these methods across all known repeat expansions is still lacking, it is clear that these methods are a valuable addition to any existing analysis pipeline. Here, we detail how to assess short-read data for evidence of expansions, reviewing all four methods and outlining their strengths and weaknesses. Implementation of these methods should lead to increased diagnostic yield of repeat expansion disorders for known STR loci and has the potential to detect novel repeat expansions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.