Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946366›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2018

Optimal cut-off points for waist circumference in the definition of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: baseline analyses of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

Thiane Ristow Cardinal, Alvaro Vigo, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Sheila Maria Alvim Matos, Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca, Sandhi Maria Barreto, Maria Inês Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thiane Ristow Cardinal1Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua São Luis 662/1405, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul CEP 90620-170 Brazil.
Alvaro Vigo2Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, n◦ 2600, sala 519, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul CEP 90035-003 Brazil.
Bruce Bartholow Duncan4Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, n◦ 2600, sala 519, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul CEP 90035-003 Brazil.
Sheila Maria Alvim Matos6Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Rua Basílio da Gama, Canela, Salvador, Bahia CEP 40000-110 Brazil.
Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca7Departament of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods in Health, National School of Public Health FIOCRUZ, Rua Leopoldo Bulhões 1480, Sala 818, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21041-210 Brazil.
Sandhi Maria Barreto8Research Group on Epidemiology on Chronic and Occupational Diseases (GERMINAL), School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Alfredo Balena 190, sala 814, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais CEP 30130100 Brazil.
Maria Inês Schmidt4Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, n◦ 2600, sala 519, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul CEP 90035-003 Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWaist circumference (WC) has been incorporated in the definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) but the exact WC cut-off points across populations are not clear. The Joint Interim Statement (JIS) suggested possible cut-offs to different populations and ethnic groups. However, the adequacy of these cut-offs to Brazilian adults has been scarcely investigated. The objective of the study is to evaluate possible WC thresholds to be used in the definition of MetS using data from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), a multicenter cohort study of civil servants (35-74 years old) of six Brazilian cities.

methodsWe analyzed baseline data from 14,893 participants (6772 men and 8121 women). A MetS was defined according to the JIS criteria, but excluding WC and thus requiring 2 of the 4 remaining elements. We used restricted cubic spline regression to graph the relationship between WC and MetS. We identified optimal cut-off points which maximized joint sensitivity and specificity (Youden's index) from Receiver Operator Characteristic Curves. We also estimated the C-statistics using logistic regression.

resultsWe found no apparent threshold for WC in restricted cubic spline plots. Optimal cut-off for men was 92 cm (2 cm lower than that recommended by JIS for Caucasian/Europids or Sub-Saharan African men), but 2 cm higher than that recommended for ethnic Central and South American. For women, optimal cut-off was 86, 6 cm higher than that recommended for Caucasian/Europids and ethnic Central and South American. Optimal cut-offs did not very across age groups and most common race/color categories (except for Asian men, 87 cm).

conclusionsSex-specific cut-offs for WC recommended by JIS differ from optimal cut-offs we found for adult men and women of Brazil´s most common ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Cut-off pointMetabolic syndromeWaist circumference

Identifiers

PMID29946366
PMCPMC6003213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.