Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946346›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018

Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.

Pinit Noorit, Boonying Siribumrungwong, Ammarin Thakkinstian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01659983 (Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Closure Versus Primary Closure in Complicated Appendicitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01659983 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Closure Versus Primary Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRamathibodi HospitalRan2012 to 2016Enrolled600ConditionsSurgical Site InfectionArmsPrimary wound closure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pinit Noorit1Department of Surgery, Chonburi hospital, Chonburi, Thailand.
Boonying Siribumrungwong2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum thani, Thailand.
Ammarin ThakkinstianSection for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI road, Rachatevi, Bangkok, 10400 Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9991-386X
Chonburi Hospital · THMahidol University · THThammasat University Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is common after appendectomy. This study aims to determine a clinical prediction score for SSI after appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Methods: Data from randomized controlled trial of delayed versus primary wound closures in complicated appendicitis was used. Nineteen patient- and operative-related predictors were selected in the logit model. Clinical prediction score was then constructed using coefficients of significant predictors. Risk stratification was done by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Bootstrap technique was used to internal validate the score. Results: Among 607 patients, the SSI incidence was 8.7% (95% CI 6.4, 11.2). Four predictors were significantly associated with SSI, i.e., presence of diabetes, incisional length > 7 cm, fecal contamination, and operative time > 75 min with the odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.2, 5.9), 2.8 (1.5, 5.4), 3.6 (1.9, 6.8), and 3.4 (1.8, 6.5), respectively. Clinical prediction score ranged from 0 to 4.5 with its discrimination concordance (C) statistic of 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81). Risk stratification classified patients into very low, low, moderate, and high risk groups for SSI when none, one, two, and more than two risk factors were presented with positive likelihood ratio of 1.00, 1.45, 3.32, and 9.28, respectively. A bootstrap demonstrated well calibration and thus good internal validation. Conclusions: Diabetes, incisional length, fecal contamination, and operative time could be used to predict SSI with acceptable discrimination. This clinical risk prediction should be useful in prediction of SSI. However, external validation should be performed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT01659983), registered August 8, 2012.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAppendectomyAppendicitisFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk FactorsStatistics, NonparametricSurgical Wound InfectionAppendicitisPrediction scoresRisk factorsSurgical site infectionWound infection

Identifiers

PMID29946346
PMCPMC6006790
OpenAlexW2808225418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.