Trial reportWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018
Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.
Trial report in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01659983 (Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Closure Versus Primary Closure in Complicated Appendicitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Closure Versus Primary Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed versus primary closure to minimize risk of surgical-site infection for complicated appendicitis: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial using counterfactual prediction modeling.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024Trial
- Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023Trial
- Article
- Comparison of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections after Paediatric Appendectomies in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Coastal Karnataka.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Association between body composition and incisional surgical site infection after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Impact of preoperative factors and waiting time on post-appendectomy complications: a retrospective study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial stewardship program for gastrointestinal surgeries at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
- Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Predictors of complicated appendicitis among patients presented to public referral hospitals in Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia: a case-control study.Surgery in practice and science · 2022Article
- Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Development and validation of risk prediction score for incisional surgical site infection after appendectomy.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Predictors for prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis in adults.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Comparison of Postoperative and Oncologic Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Open Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A 5-year Experience.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is common after appendectomy. This study aims to determine a clinical prediction score for SSI after appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Methods: Data from randomized controlled trial of delayed versus primary wound closures in complicated appendicitis was used. Nineteen patient- and operative-related predictors were selected in the logit model. Clinical prediction score was then constructed using coefficients of significant predictors. Risk stratification was done by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Bootstrap technique was used to internal validate the score. Results: Among 607 patients, the SSI incidence was 8.7% (95% CI 6.4, 11.2). Four predictors were significantly associated with SSI, i.e., presence of diabetes, incisional length > 7 cm, fecal contamination, and operative time > 75 min with the odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.2, 5.9), 2.8 (1.5, 5.4), 3.6 (1.9, 6.8), and 3.4 (1.8, 6.5), respectively. Clinical prediction score ranged from 0 to 4.5 with its discrimination concordance (C) statistic of 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81). Risk stratification classified patients into very low, low, moderate, and high risk groups for SSI when none, one, two, and more than two risk factors were presented with positive likelihood ratio of 1.00, 1.45, 3.32, and 9.28, respectively. A bootstrap demonstrated well calibration and thus good internal validation. Conclusions: Diabetes, incisional length, fecal contamination, and operative time could be used to predict SSI with acceptable discrimination. This clinical risk prediction should be useful in prediction of SSI. However, external validation should be performed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT01659983), registered August 8, 2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.