ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioprospecting secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties from soil bacteria in high-temperature ecosystems.Microbial cell factories · 2024Article
- Diversity of culturable bacterial isolates and their potential as antimicrobial against human pathogens from Afar region, Ethiopia.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Unravelling key enzymatic steps in C-ring cleavage during angucycline biosynthesis.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Cost-effective hybrid long-short read assembly delineates alternative GC-richSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2023Article
- Bioactive antifungal metabolites produced by Streptomyces amritsarensis V31 help to control diverse phytopathogenic fungi.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Urease-Producing Soil Bacteria.International journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- Methanol-Essential Growth ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 416 actinomycete cultures were isolated from various unique environments in Ethiopia and tested for bioactivity. Six isolates with pronounced antimicrobial activity were chosen for taxonomic identification and further investigation. Morphological and cultural properties of the isolates were found to be consistent with those of the genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.