Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946185›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Optimization and validation of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry staining protocols using the antibody clone 28-8 on different staining platforms.

Christina Koppel, Helena Schwellenbach, Dirk Zielinski, Sina Eckstein, Mercedes Martin-Ortega, Corrado D'Arrigo, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Josef Rüschoff, Bharat Jasani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. "Interchangeability" of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunohistochemistry of Brain Tissues.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Top-levelTranslational lung cancer research · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina KoppelTargos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Helena SchwellenbachTargos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Dirk ZielinskiTargos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel, Germany. Dirk.Zielinski@targos-gmbh.de.
Sina EcksteinInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Mercedes Martin-OrtegaInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Corrado D'ArrigoPoundbury Cancer Institute, Dorchester, UK.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Josef RüschoffTargos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Bharat JasaniTargos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed to assess tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in patients who are candidates for programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. The PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx kit is FDA-approved as a complementary diagnostic and CE-marked as an in vitro diagnostic device for nivolumab therapy in melanoma and specific lung cancer subtypes (and for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck/urothelial carcinoma in Europe only). Kit availability is limited outside the United States, and its use requires the Dako Autostainer Link 48 platform, which is unavailable in many laboratories. Validated laboratory-developed tests based on 28-8 concentrated antibody outside the kit are needed. This study compared the results from PD-L1 expression level analysis across four immunohistochemistry platforms (Dako Autostainer Link 48, Dako Omnis, Leica Bond-III, and Ventana BenchMark ULTRA) with the 28-8 pharmDx kit in lung cancer (multiple histologies), melanoma, and head and neck cancer (multiple histologies). Samples were prepared per protocol for each platform and stained using PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx kit on Dako Autostainer Link 48, and per protocol for each platform. The control samples (tonsil and placenta tissue; cell lines with prespecified PD-L1 expression levels) were tested to evaluate the specificity and the sensitivity of test assays. An agreement level of 0.90 with the pharmDx kit was set for each platform. Inter- and intra-assay reliability were assessed. Evaluable samples were lung cancer = 29; melanoma = 31; head and neck cancer = 30. Mean agreement was calculated for PD-L1 expression levels of ≥1%, ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥50%. Mean overall agreement for all indications was 0.87-0.99. Inter- and intra-assay of scoring/classification repeatability was 100%. Analysis of PD-L1 expression levels using laboratory-developed immunohistochemistry assays with 28-8 antibody may be permissible if the platform is validated using reference samples with defined expression levels.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunohistochemistryStaining and LabelingAntibodies, MonoclonalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29946185
OpenAlexW2809762932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.