Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946159›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Efficacy of commercial vaccines against newly emerging avian influenza H5N8 virus in Egypt.

Ahmed Kandeil, Jamal S M Sabir, Ahmed Abdelaal, Ehab H Mattar, Ahmed N El-Taweel, Mumdooh J Sabir, Ahmed Aly Khalil, Richard Webby, Ghazi Kayali, Mohamed A Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ahmed KandeilCenter of Scientific Excellence for Influenza Viruses, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Jamal S M SabirBiotechnology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AbdelaalFaculty of Biotechnology, October University of Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Cairo, Egypt.
Ehab H MattarBiotechnology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed N El-TaweelCenter of Scientific Excellence for Influenza Viruses, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Mumdooh J SabirDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Aly KhalilVeterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Richard WebbyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Ghazi KayaliDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas, USA. ghazi@human-link.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5387-1622
Mohamed A AliCenter of Scientific Excellence for Influenza Viruses, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt. mohamedahmedali2004@yahoo.com.
King Abdulaziz University · SANational Water Research Center · EGHuman Computer Interaction (Switzerland) · CHOctober University of Modern Sciences and Arts · EGSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USVeterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute · EG

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The newly emerging, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N8 virus of clade 2.3.4.4 was recently detected in wild birds and domestic poultry in Egypt in the 2016/2017 winter season. Vaccination based on commercial H5 vaccines is used as an essential control strategy in Egyptian poultry. Here, we studied the efficacy of the eight most common commercial H5 poultry vaccines in the Egyptian market and compared them with an experimental vaccine based on the Egyptian LPAI H5N8 virus that was prepared by using reverse genetics. The experimental vaccine and Re-5 commercial vaccine were able to completely protect chickens and significantly reduce virus shedding. Our results indicate that most of the commercial poultry H5 vaccines used in the present study were ineffective because the seed viruses in these vaccines are genetically distinct from the H5N8 viruses currently circulating in Egypt. Although some of the commercial vaccines protected chickens from mortality, they failed to prevent chickens from shedding the virus. Accordingly, we recommend updating and reinforcing the H5N8 prevention and control strategies in Egypt. The vaccination strategy should be reconsidered based on currently circulating viruses.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensEgyptInfluenza A Virus, H5N8 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29946159
PMCPMC6018731
OpenAlexW2808951176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.