Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946130›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Pooled CRISPR interference screening enables genome-scale functional genomics study in bacteria with superior performance.

Tianmin Wang, Changge Guan, Jiahui Guo, Bing Liu, Yinan Wu, Zhen Xie, Chong Zhang, Xin-Hui Xing

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A programmableApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systematic CRISPRi screening reveals genetic modulators ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CRISPRi Screening Identifies EssentialInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Design of CRISPRi-Based Synthetic Gene Circuits in Bacteria.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analysis of essential genes inJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianmin WangMOE Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Changge GuanMOE Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Jiahui GuoMOE Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Bing LiuBeijing Syngentech Co., Ltd., Beijing, 102206, China.
Yinan WuMOE Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Zhen XieMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division, Center for Synthetic and System Biology, Department of Automation, Tsinghua National Lab for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Chong ZhangMOE Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. chongzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-8855
Xin-Hui XingMOE Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) NSFC21627812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To fully exploit the microbial genome resources, a high-throughput experimental platform is needed to associate genes with phenotypes at the genome level. We present here a novel method that enables investigation of the cellular consequences of repressing individual transcripts based on the CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) pooled screening in bacteria. We identify rules for guide RNA library design to handle the unique structure of prokaryotic genomes by tiling screening and construct an E. coli genome-scale guide RNA library (~60,000 members) accordingly. We show that CRISPRi outperforms transposon sequencing, the benchmark method in the microbial functional genomics field, when similar library sizes are used or gene length is short. This tool is also effective for mapping phenotypes to non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), as elucidated by a comprehensive tRNA-fitness map constructed here. Our results establish CRISPRi pooled screening as a powerful tool for mapping complex prokaryotic genetic networks in a precise and high-throughput manner.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBacteriaButanolsChromosome MappingEscherichia coliFuraldehydeGene LibraryGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, EssentialGenome, BacterialGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingINDEL MutationMetabolic Networks and PathwaysRNA, BacterialRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsButanolsFuraldehydeisobutyl alcoholRNA, BacterialRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID29946130
PMCPMC6018678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.