Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946069›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

An effect of serotonergic stimulation on learning rates for rewards apparent after long intertrial intervals.

Kiyohito Iigaya, Madalena S Fonseca, Masayoshi Murakami, Zachary F Mainen, Peter Dayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Neuromorphic Devices and Computing for Sensing, Memory, and Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Building Goal-Directed Cognitive Graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optogenetic Stimulation of Novel Tph2-Cre Rats Advances Insight into Serotonin's Role in Locomotion, Reinforcement, and Compulsivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computational and Neural Evidence for Altered Fast and Slow Learning from Losses in Problem Gambling.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiyohito IigayaGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, 25 Howland Street, London, W1T 4JG, UK. kiigaya@gatsby.ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-8432
Madalena S FonsecaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Masayoshi MurakamiChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Zachary F MainenChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, 25 Howland Street, London, W1T 4JG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839

Funding

European Research Council 250334European Research Council 671251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serotonin has widespread, but computationally obscure, modulatory effects on learning and cognition. Here, we studied the impact of optogenetic stimulation of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons in mice performing a non-stationary, reward-driven decision-making task. Animals showed two distinct choice strategies. Choices after short inter-trial-intervals (ITIs) depended only on the last trial outcome and followed a win-stay-lose-switch pattern. In contrast, choices after long ITIs reflected outcome history over multiple trials, as described by reinforcement learning models. We found that optogenetic stimulation during a trial significantly boosted the rate of learning that occurred due to the outcome of that trial, but these effects were only exhibited on choices after long ITIs. This suggests that serotonin neurons modulate reinforcement learning rates, and that this influence is masked by alternate, unaffected, decision mechanisms. These results provide insight into the role of serotonin in treating psychiatric disorders, particularly its modulation of neural plasticity and learning.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingDorsal Raphe NucleusLearningMiceMice, TransgenicModels, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalNeuronal PlasticityOptogeneticsReinforcement, PsychologySerotonergic NeuronsSerotoninSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSerotoninSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSlc6a4 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID29946069
PMCPMC6018802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.