Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29946020›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Gene expression distribution deconvolution in single-cell RNA sequencing.

Jingshu Wang, Mo Huang, Eduardo Torre, Hannah Dueck, Sydney Shaffer, John Murray, Arjun Raj, Mingyao Li, Nancy R Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Leveraging gene correlations in single cell transcriptomic data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jingshu WangDepartment of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Mo HuangDepartment of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Eduardo TorreDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Hannah DueckDepartment of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Sydney ShafferDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
John MurrayDepartment of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Arjun RajDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Mingyao LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Nancy R ZhangDepartment of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; nzh@wharton.upenn.edu.

Funding

Elucidation of Tissue-Specific Transcriptomic Profiles in Cardiometabolic DiseaseR01HL113147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2012 to 2022
$6.8M
Statistical Models for Genome Sequencing and AssociationR01HG006137 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JI, HANLEE P, ZHANG, NANCY R · 2011 to 2022
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Single-Cell TranscriptomicsR01GM125301 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, ZHANG, NANCY R · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Statistical Methods for Transcriptome Profiling Using RNA SequencingR01GM108600 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
Single cell reconstruction of lineages and variability in C. elegans embryosR21HD085201 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MURRAY, JOHN ISAAC · 2015 to 2016
$438k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006137NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113147NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD085201NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108600NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables the quantification of each gene's expression distribution across cells, thus allowing the assessment of the dispersion, nonzero fraction, and other aspects of its distribution beyond the mean. These statistical characterizations of the gene expression distribution are critical for understanding expression variation and for selecting marker genes for population heterogeneity. However, scRNA-seq data are noisy, with each cell typically sequenced at low coverage, thus making it difficult to infer properties of the gene expression distribution from raw counts. Based on a reexamination of nine public datasets, we propose a simple technical noise model for scRNA-seq data with unique molecular identifiers (UMI). We develop deconvolution of single-cell expression distribution (DESCEND), a method that deconvolves the true cross-cell gene expression distribution from observed scRNA-seq counts, leading to improved estimates of properties of the distribution such as dispersion and nonzero fraction. DESCEND can adjust for cell-level covariates such as cell size, cell cycle, and batch effects. DESCEND's noise model and estimation accuracy are further evaluated through comparisons to RNA FISH data, through data splitting and simulations and through its effectiveness in removing known batch effects. We demonstrate how DESCEND can clarify and improve downstream analyses such as finding differentially expressed genes, identifying cell types, and selecting differentiation markers.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, GeneticAnimalsHumansRNARNAdifferential expressionGini coefficienthighly variable genesRNA sequencingsingle-cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29946020
PMCPMC6048536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.