Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29945662›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

The feasibility of task-sharing the identification, emergency treatment, and referral for women with pre-eclampsia by community health workers in India.

Umesh Charanthimath, Marianne Vidler, Geetanjali Katageri, Umesh Ramadurg, Chandrashekhar Karadiguddi, Avinash Kavi, Anjali Joshi, Geetanjali Mungarwadi, Sheshidhar Bannale, Sangamesh Rakaraddi and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Umesh CharanthimathKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and the Child and Family Research Unit, University of British, Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Geetanjali KatageriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India. geetanjali_mk@yahoo.co.in.
Umesh RamadurgDepartment of Community Medicine, S Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
Chandrashekhar KaradiguddiKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Avinash KaviKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Anjali JoshiKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Geetanjali MungarwadiKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Sheshidhar BannaleDepartment of Pharmacology, S Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
Sangamesh RakaraddiDepartment of Anatomy, S Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
Diane SawchuckDepartment of Research, Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Rahat QureshiDivision of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Sumedha SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and the Child and Family Research Unit, University of British, Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Beth A PayneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and the Child and Family Research Unit, University of British, Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Peter von DadelszenSchool of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, England.
Richard DermanDepartment Kings of Obstetrics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Laura A MageeSchool of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, England.
Shivaprasad GoudarKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Ashalata MallapurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
Mrutyunjaya BelladKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's, J N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
and the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) India Feasibility Working Group
Zulfiqar Bhutta
Sheela Naik
Anis Mulla
Namdev Kamle
Vaibhav Dhamanekar
Sharla K Drebit
Chirag Kariya
Tang Lee
Jing Li
Mansun Lui
Asif R Khowaja
Domena K Tu
Amit Revankar
S Nijalingappa Medical College and HSK Hospital & Research Centre · INKLE University · INUniversity of British Columbia · CAAga Khan University · PKThomas Jefferson University · USIsland Health · CAKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertensive disorders are the second highest direct obstetric cause of maternal death after haemorrhage, accounting for 14% of maternal deaths globally. Pregnancy hypertension contributes to maternal deaths, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, due to a scarcity of doctors providing evidence-based emergency obstetric care. Task-sharing some obstetric responsibilities may help to reduce the mortality rates. This study was conducted to assess acceptability by the community and other healthcare providers, for task-sharing by community health workers (CHW) in the identification and initial care in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

methodsThis study was conducted in two districts of Karnataka state in south India. A total of 14 focus group discussions were convened with various community representatives: women of reproductive age (N = 6), male decision-makers (N = 2), female decision-makers (N = 3), and community leaders (N = 3). One-to-one interviews were held with medical officers (N = 2), private healthcare OBGYN specialists (N = 2), senior health administrators (N = 2), Taluka (county) health officers (N = 2), and obstetricians (N = 4). All data collection was facilitated by local researchers familiar with the setting and language. Data were subsequently transcribed, translated and analysed thematically using NVivo 10 software.

resultsThere was strong community support for home visits by CHW to measure the blood pressure of pregnant women; however, respondents were concerned about their knowledge, training and effectiveness. The treatment with oral antihypertensive agents and magnesium sulphate in emergencies was accepted by community representatives but medical practitioners and health administrators had reservations, and insisted on emergency transport to a higher facility. The most important barriers for task-sharing were concerns regarding insufficient training, limited availability of medications, the questionable validity of blood pressure devices, and the ability of CHW to correctly diagnose and intervene in cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

conclusionTask-sharing to community-based health workers has potential to facilitate early diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and assist in the provision of emergency care. We identified some facilitators and barriers for successful task-sharing of emergency obstetric care aimed at reducing mortality and morbidity due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersEmergency TreatmentHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeReferral and ConsultationCommunity Health ServicesEmergency Medical ServicesFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth ResourcesHumansIndiaMaleMaternal MortalityPre-EclampsiaPregnancyAntihypertensivesBlood pressureCommunity health workersMagnesium sulphatePre-eclampsiaTask-sharing

Identifiers

PMID29945662
PMCPMC6019995
OpenAlexW2809019069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.