Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29945648›Full record

ReviewReproductive health2018

Strategies for optimizing maternal nutrition to promote infant development.

K Michael Hambidge, Nancy F Krebs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K Michael HambidgeSection of Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12700 E 19th Ave, MS C-225, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. michael.hambidge@ucdenver.edu.
Nancy F KrebsSection of Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12700 E 19th Ave, MS C-225, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Nutrition-specific interventions to improve long-term maternal-child health outcomesUG1HD076474 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Edwin Jose Asturias, NANCY F KREBS · 2018 to 2026
$5.4M
The Global Network and Preconception Maternal NutritionU10HD076474 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KREBS, NANCY F · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076474NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing appreciation of the multi-faceted importance of optimal maternal nutrition to the health and development of the infant and young child is tempered by incompletely resolved strategies for combatting challenges.

objectiveTo review the importance of maternal nutrition and strategies being employed to optimize outcomes.

methodsSelected data from recent literature with special focus on rationale for and currently published results of maternal nutrition supplements, including lipid based nutrition supplements.

results1) An impelling rationale for improving the maternal and in utero environment of low resource populations has emerged to achieve improved fetal and post-natal growth and development. 2) Based partly on population increases in adult height over one-two generations, much can be achieved by reducing poverty. 3) Maternal, newborn and infant characteristics associated with low resource environments include evidence of undernutrition, manifested by underweight and impaired linear growth. 4) Apart from broad public health and educational initiatives, to date, most specific efforts to improve fetal growth and development have included maternal nutrition interventions during gestation. 5) The relatively limited but real benefits of both iron/folic acid (IFA) and multiple micronutrient (MMN) maternal supplements during gestation have now been reasonably defined. 6) Recent investigations of a maternal lipid-based primarily micronutrient supplement (LNS) have not demonstrated a consistent benefit beyond MMN alone. 7) However, effects of both MMN and LNS appear to be enhanced by commencing early in gestation.

conclusionsPoor maternal nutritional status is one of a very few specific factors in the human that not only contributes to impaired fetal and early post-natal growth but for which maternal interventions have demonstrated improved in utero development, documented primarily by both improvements in low birth weights and by partial corrections of impaired birth length. A clearer definition of the benefits achievable by interventions specifically focused on correcting maternal nutrition deficits should not be limited to improvements in the quality of maternal nutrition supplements, but on the cumulative quantity and timing of interventions (also recognizing the heterogeneity between populations). Finally, in an ideal world these steps are only a prelude to improvements in the total environment in which optimal nutrition and other health determinants can be achieved.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultChildDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMicronutrientsPregnancyFolic AcidMicronutrientsMaternalMultiple micronutrientsNutritionPregnancy outcomesSmall-quantity lipid-based nutrition supplements

Identifiers

PMID29945648
PMCPMC6019994
OpenAlexW2809155444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.