Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29945604›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2018

Who benefit from school doctors' health checks: a prospective study of a screening method.

Kirsi Nikander, Silja Kosola, Minna Kaila, Elina Hermanson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03178331 (Who Benefit From School Doctors' Health Checks), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03178331 completednot on this map

Who Benefit From School Doctors' Health Checks: a Prospective Study of a Screening Method in Finland

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of HelsinkiRan2017 to 2023Enrolled1,013ConditionsSchool Health ServicesArmsStudy questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsi NikanderSchool and Student Healthcare, Department of Social Services and Healthcare, City of Helsinki, Finland. kirsi.nikander@iki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-8196-5167
Silja KosolaMedical Services for Children and Adolescents, Department of Social Services and Healthcare, City of Helsinki, Finland.
Minna KailaPublic Health Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Elina HermansonPikkujätti Medical Centre for Children and Youth, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchool health services provide an excellent opportunity for the detection and treatment of children at risk of later health problems. However, the optimal use of school doctors' skills and expertise remains unknown. Furthermore, no validated method for screening children for school doctors' assessments exists. The aims of the study are 1) to evaluate the benefits or harm of school doctors' routine health checks in primary school grades 1 and 5 (at ages 7 and 11) and 2) to explore whether some of the school doctors' routine health checks can be omitted using study questionnaires.

methodsThis is a prospective, multicenter observational study conducted in four urban municipalities in Southern Finland by comparing the need for a school doctor's assessment to the benefit gained from it. We will recruit a random sample of 1050 children from 21 schools from primary school grades 1 and 5. Before the school doctor's health check, parents, nurses and teachers fill a study questionnaire to identify any potential concerns about each child. Doctors, blinded to the questionnaire responses, complete an electronic report after the appointment, including given instructions and follow-up plans. The child, parent, doctor and researchers assess the benefit of the health check. The researchers compare the need for a doctor's appointment to the benefit gained from it. At one year after the health check, we will analyze the implementation of the doctors' interventions and follow-up plans. DISCUSSION: The study will increase our knowledge of the benefits of school doctors' routine health checks and assess the developed screening method. We hypothesize that targeting the health checks to the children in greatest need would increase the quality of school health services.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03178331 , date of registration June 6

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningSchool Health ServicesChildFemaleFinlandHumansMaleParentsPhysiciansProspective StudiesResearch DesignSchool NursingSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenHealth checkQuestionnairesSchool health servicesScreeningStudent

Identifiers

PMID29945604
PMCPMC6020452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.