ArticleBMC medical ethics2018
A reflection on the challenge of protecting confidentiality of participants while disseminating research results locally.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring sensitive topics in assessment research through vignette-based interviewing.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- What constitutes risk in implementation research? Perspectives from a qualitative key-informant study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations in implementation research: a scoping review of key principles, unintended consequences, and emerging ethical guidance.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Strengthening ethical oversight in genomics and biobanking: a retrospective analysis of research practices in Zimbabwe.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- The neural correlates of illness awareness in addiction: a pilot exploratory analysis of preliminary data from the cognitive dysfunction in the addictions (CDiA) research program.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- How do study participants want to be informed about study results: Findings from a malaria trial in Cambodia, Ethiopia, Pakistan, and Indonesia.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Rural health research in the 21st century: A commentary on challenges and the role of digital technology.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Identifying and Minimizing Incentives for Competing Interests in Sports Medicine Publications.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (CCQR): Reporting Guideline for Global Health Qualitative Research Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Review
- Recognising values and engaging communities across cultures: towards developing a cultural protocol for researchers.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- The unintended consequences of COVID-19 mitigation measures matter: practical guidance for investigating them.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Ethical Considerations for Disseminating Research Findings on Gender-Based Violence, Armed Conflict, and Mental Health: A Case Study from Rural Uganda.Health and human rights · 2019Article
- Data sharing considerations and practice among health researchers in Africa: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearchers studying health systems in low-income countries face a myriad of ethical challenges throughout the entire research process. In this article, we discuss one of the greatest ethical challenges that we encountered during our fieldwork in West Africa: the difficulty of protecting the confidentiality of participants (or groups of participants) while locally disseminating results of health systems research to stakeholders.
methodsThis reflection is based on experiences of authors involved in conducting evaluative research of interventions aimed at improving health systems in West Africa. Our observation and collaboration with the research projects' stakeholders informed our analysis. Examples from two research projects illustrate the issues raised.
resultsWe found that in some cases there is a risk that local stakeholders may be able to identify research participants, or at least groups of participants, during the dissemination of results, even if they are anonymized. Four factors can interact and influence this challenge: 1) hierarchical structure, 2) small milieu, 3) immersion in a few sites, and 4) vested interests of decision-makers. For example, local stakeholders can sometimes find out when and where the data were collected. Moreover, health systems, especially rural healthcare centres, in West African countries can be small settings, so people often know each other. Some types of participants have unique characteristics or positions in the health system that may make them more easily identifiable by local stakeholders familiar with the environment. We identified a number of potential strategies that can help researchers minimize this difficulty and improve ethical research practices. These strategies pertain to the development of the study design, the process of obtaining informed consent, the dissemination of results, and the researchers' reflexivity.
conclusionResearchers must develop and adopt strategies that enable them to respect their promise of confidentiality while effectively disseminating sometimes sensitive results. Reflections surrounding ethical issues in global health research should be deepened to better address how to manage competing ethical responsibilities while promoting valuable research uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.