Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29945580›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Neighborhood deprivation and biomarkers of health in Britain: the mediating role of the physical environment.

M Pia Chaparro, Michaela Benzeval, Elizabeth Richardson, Richard Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Socioeconomic inequalities in exposure to neighbourhood environments for physical activity: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Intersection of Socioeconomic and Environmental Factors in Aging: Insights from a Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Moderate PMFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Greenness exposure: beneficial but multidimensional.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Pia ChaparroInstitute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex. Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Michaela BenzevalInstitute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex. Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK. mbenzeval@essex.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0372-2098
Elizabeth RichardsonNHS Health Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 S Gyle Cres, Edinburgh, EH12 9EB, UK.
Richard MitchellInstitute for Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU10Economic and Social Research Council ES/M008591/1European Research Council ERC-2010-StG Grant 263501Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeighborhood deprivation has been consistently linked to poor individual health outcomes; however, studies exploring the mechanisms involved in this association are scarce. The objective of this study was to investigate whether objective measures of the physical environment mediate the association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and biomarkers of health in Britain.

methodsWe linked individual-level biomarker data from Understanding Society: The UK Household Longitudinal Survey (2010-2012) to neighborhood-level data from different governmental sources. Our outcome variables were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

resultsResidents of poor neighborhoods and those exposed to higher pollution and less green space had worse health outcomes. However, only SO

conclusionReducing air pollution exposure and increasing access to green space may improve population health but may not decrease health inequalities in Britain.

Indexed as

EnvironmentHealth Status DisparitiesPoverty AreasAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAir PollutionBiomarkersBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCarbon MonoxideC-Reactive ProteinEnvironmental ExposureEnvironment DesignFemaleBiomarkersCarbon MonoxideC-Reactive ProteinNitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterSulfur DioxideBiomarkersBritainMediation analysisPhysical environmentSocioeconomic deprivation

Identifiers

PMID29945580
PMCPMC6020450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.