ArticleBMC medical education2018
Mobile learning in medicine: an evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nontechnical skills for the surgery clerkship in the operating room based on adult learning principles in Taiwan.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2022Trial
- Facilitators and Barriers to Adoption of Mobile Learning Technologies in Undergraduate Health Professional Education in Clinical Environments: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of an educational application on dental students prescription knowledge: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Educational Application for Cardiac Anesthesiology Trainees: Tutorial on App Development.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Lower Back Pain (LBP) and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Alfaisal University Medical Students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Schema: A Quantified Learning Solution to Augment, Assess, and Analyze Learning in Medicine.Cureus · 2025Article
- Micro-learning and Mindtools in Mobile-Learning (M-Learning): effects on knowledge and self-efficacy in laparoscopy education for surgical nursing students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Sleep Quality Among Medical Students Across Latin America: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Impact of Students' Socio-economic Background, Study Habits, and Technology Access on Their Histology Learning Strategy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Attitudes and perceptions of health schools' students toward mobile learning: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Behaviors and attitudes towards mobile learning during course work and scientific research among dental, medical and non-medical undergraduates: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Exploring smartphone use and its applicability in academic training of medical students in Latin America: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Mobile Apps Used among Medical Students for Learning and Education: A Mixed-Method Concurrent Triangulation Approach.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Health professionals' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline application in a resource-limited setting: using a modified UTAUT model.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Online learning resources and social media platforms used by medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- ToxRunner: the Development of a Non-commercial Mobile Digital Question Bank for the Graduate Medical Education Sub-specialty of Medical Toxicology.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023Article
- The Effect of Mobile Applied Anatomy Learning on Students' Academic Success, Cognitive Loads, and Attitudes.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Development and perceived usability evaluation of an interactive smartphone application for the teaching of hemodynamics and evaluation of arterial pulse pressure variation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Mobile technology acceptance among undergraduate nursing students instructed by blended learning at selected educational institutions in South India.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Comparing Knowledge Acquisition and Retention Between Mobile Learning and Traditional Learning in Teaching Respiratory Therapy Students: A Randomized Control Trial.Advances in medical education and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile learning (mLearning) devices (such as tablets and smartphones) are increasingly part of the clinical environment but there is a limited and somewhat conflicting literature regarding the impact of such devices in the clinical learning environment. This study aims to: assess the impact of mLearning devices in the clinical learning environment on medical students' studying habits, attitudes towards mobile device supported learning; and the perceived reaction of clinicians and patients to the use of these devices as part of learning in the clinical setting.
methodsOver three consecutive academic years, 18 cohorts of medical students (total n = 275) on a six-week rotation at a large teaching hospital in London were supplied with mLearning devices (iPad mini) to support their placement-based learning. Feedback on their experiences and perceptions was collected via pre- and post-use questionnaires.
resultsThe results suggest mLearning devices have a positive effect on the students' perceived efficiency of working, while experience of usage not only confirmed pre-existing positive opinions about devices but also disputed some expected limitations associated with mLearning devices in the clinical workplace. Students were more likely to use devices in 'down-time' than as part of their clinical learning. As anticipated, both by users and from the literature, universal internet access was a major limitation to device use. The results were inconclusive about the student preference for device provision versus supporting a pre-owned device.
conclusionM-learning devices can have a positive impact on the learning experiences medical students during their clinical attachments. The results supported the feasibility of providing mLearning devices to support learning in the clinical environment. However, universal internet is a fundamental limitation to optimal device utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.