Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29945563›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Estimates and predictors of health care costs of esophageal adenocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study.

Hla-Hla Thein, Nathaniel Jembere, Kednapa Thavorn, Kelvin K W Chan, Peter C Coyte, Claire de Oliveira, Chin Hur, Craig C Earle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Economic impacts of care by high-volume providers for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hla-Hla TheinDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. rosie.thein@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-187X
Nathaniel JembereDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornOttawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kelvin K W ChanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter C CoyteInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Claire de OliveiraInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Chin HurGastroenterology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Craig C EarleInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAHarvard University · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Controlling Esophageal Cancer: A Collaborative Modeling ApproachU01CA199336 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HUR, CHIN, INADOMI, JOHN MATTHEW · 2015 to 2019
$5.9M
Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research 30008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence is increasing rapidly. Esophageal cancer has the second lowest 5-year survival rate of people diagnosed with cancer in Canada. Given the poor survival and the potential for further increases in incidence, phase-specific cost estimates constitute an important input for economic evaluation of prevention, screening, and treatment interventions. The study aims to estimate phase-specific net direct medical costs of care attributable to EAC, costs stratified by cancer stage and treatment, and predictors of total net costs of care for EAC.

methodsA population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using Ontario Cancer Registry-linked administrative health data from 2003 to 2011. The mean net costs of EAC care per 30 patient-days (2016 CAD) were estimated from the payer perspective using phase of care approach and generalized estimating equations. Predictors of net cost by phase of care were based on a generalized estimating equations model with a logarithmic link and gamma distribution adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

resultsThe mean net costs of EAC care per 30 patient-days were $1016 (95% CI, $955-$1078) in the initial phase, $669 (95% CI, $594-$743) in the continuing care phase, and $8678 (95% CI, $8217-$9139) in the terminal phase. Overall, stage IV at diagnosis and surgery plus radiotherapy for EAC incurred the highest cost, particularly in the terminal phase. Strong predictors of higher net costs were receipt of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, surgery plus chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone, surgery alone, and chemotherapy alone in the initial and continuing care phases, stage III-IV disease and patients diagnosed with EAC later in a calendar year (2007-2011) in the initial and terminal phases, comorbidity in the continuing care phase, and older age at diagnosis (70-74 years), and geographic region in the terminal phase.

conclusionsCosts of care vary by phase of care, stage at diagnosis, and type of treatment for EAC. These cost estimates provide information to guide future resource allocation decisions, and clinical and policy interventions to reduce the burden of EAC.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesCosts and cost analysisEsophageal adenocarcinomaHealth care costsStage at diagnosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID29945563
PMCPMC6020438
OpenAlexW2810650147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.