SynthesisClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2019
Effect of Accelerated Infliximab Induction on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second United Arab Emirates consensus guidance on the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Optimal Salvage Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Systematic Review: Efficacy and Safety of Accelerated Induction Regimes in Infliximab Rescue Therapy for Hospitalized Patients with Acute Severe Colitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Comparable Long-Term Outcomes of Cyclosporine and Infliximab in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Pooled it
- [Advances in the clinical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in 2025 and Beyond.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Sex-Specific Differences in Outcomes and Trends in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Review Article: Albumin and Its Role in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Old, the New, and the Future.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Future of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Defining management strategies for acute severe ulcerative colitis using predictive models: a simulation-modeling study.Intestinal research · 2024Article
- Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Infliximab-Experienced Patients.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Outcomes Following Acute Severe Colitis at Initial Presentation: A Multi-centre, Prospective, Paediatric Cohort Study.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Article
- Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Corticosteroids combined with infliximab vs. corticosteroids sequential infliximab for acute severe ulcerative colitis with mucosal deficiency: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Acute severe ulcerative colitis: using JAK-STAT inhibitors for improved clinical outcomes.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparison of accelerated and standard infliximab induction regimens in acute severe ulcerative colitis using propensity score analysis: a retrospective multicenter study in China.Gastroenterology report · 2024Article
- Anti-TNF.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Article
- Infliximab Induction Strategies in Corticosteroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Series and Literature Review.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Review article: Updated management of acute severe ulcerative colitis: From steroids to novel medical strategies.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2019
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsIn patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), standard infliximab induction therapy has modest efficacy. There are limited data on the short-term or long-term efficacy of accelerated infliximab induction therapy for these patients.
methodsIn a retrospective study, we collected data from 213 patients with steroid refractory ASUC who received infliximab rescue therapy at 3 centers, from 2005 through 2017. Patients were classified that received standard therapy (5mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6) or accelerated therapy (>5mg/kg infliximab at shorter intervals). The primary outcome was colectomy in-hospital and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for relevant confounders. We also performed a meta-analysis of published effects of standard vs accelerated infliximab treatment of ASUC.
resultsIn the retrospective analysis, 81 patients received accelerated infliximab therapy and 132 received standard infliximab therapy. There were no differences in characteristics between the groups, including levels of C-reactive protein or albumin. Similar proportions of patients in each group underwent in-hospital colectomy (9% receiving accelerated therapy vs 8% receiving standard therapy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.38-4.82). There was no significant difference between groups in proportions that underwent colectomy at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months (P > .20 for all comparisons). Among those in the accelerated group, an initial dose of 10 mg/kg was associated with a lower rate of colectomy compared to patients who initially received 5 mg/kg followed by subsequent doses of 5mg/kg or higher. Our systematic review identified 7 studies (181 patients receiving accelerated infliximab and 436 receiving standard infliximab) and found no significant differences in short- or long-term outcomes.
conclusionIn a retrospective study and meta-analysis, we found no association between accelerated infliximab induction therapy and lower rates of colectomy in patients with ASUC, compared to standard induction therapy. However, confounding by disease severity cannot be excluded. Randomized trials are warranted to compare these treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.