Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29944456›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2018

Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS

Barry Dewitt, David Feeny, Baruch Fischhoff, David Cella, Ron D Hays, Rachel Hess, Paul A Pilkonis, Dennis A Revicki, Mark S Roberts, Joel Tsevat and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05039554 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and a Care Management App in Primary Care-based Buprenorphine Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2023 to 2027Enrolled125ConditionsOpioid-use Disorder, Chronic PainArmsAcceptance and commitment therapy, Valera Smartphone Application, Treatment as Usual
NCT06086301 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Testing Post-Intensive Care Transitions Using Rehabilitation and Engagement To Heal ICU Survivors and Families (PICTURE-THIS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2023 to 2025Enrolled42ConditionsPost-intensive Care Syndrome, Transitional Care, Critical Care, Health ServicesArmsPICTURE-THIS, Enhanced Usual Care, Run-In Phase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in populations with a mean age of ≥ 75 years: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Do we agree on health state outcomes? A review of measurement agreement between time-trade off and other utility measures.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Barry DewittCarnegie Mellon University, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-6736
David FeenyMcMaster University Faculty of Social Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Baruch FischhoffCarnegie Mellon University, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David CellaNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ron D HaysUniversity of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rachel HessUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Paul A PilkonisUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dennis A RevickiEvidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark S RobertsUniversity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joel TsevatUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Lan YuUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Janel HanmerUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001856 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, KRISTIN N, RUBIO, DORIS M · 2016 to 2025
$13.8M
The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
PROMIS Statistical CenterU54AR057951 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2009 to 2014
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001856NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCI NIH HHS U2C CA186878NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQL) preference-based scores are used to assess the health of populations and patients and for cost-effectiveness analyses. The National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS

objectiveTo produce societal preference-based scores for 7 PROMIS domains: Cognitive Function-Abilities, Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference, Physical Function, Sleep Disturbance, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities.

settingOnline survey of a US nationally representative sample ( n = 983).

methodsPreferences for PROMIS health states were elicited with the standard gamble to obtain both single-attribute scoring functions for each of the 7 PROMIS domains and a multiplicative multiattribute utility (scoring) function.

resultsThe 7 single-attribute scoring functions were fit using isotonic regression with linear interpolation. The multiplicative multiattribute summary function estimates utilities for PROMIS multiattribute health states on a scale where 0 is the utility of being dead and 1 the utility of "full health." The lowest possible score is -0.022 (for a state viewed as worse than dead), and the highest possible score is 1. LIMITATIONS: The online survey systematically excludes some subgroups, such as the visually impaired and illiterate.

conclusionsA generic societal preference-based scoring system is now available for all studies using these 7 PROMIS health domains.

Indexed as

Health StatusPatient PreferencePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMobility LimitationPainSleepSocial Participationhealth-related quality of lifehealth utilityPROMISUS general population

Identifiers

PMID29944456
PMCPMC6502464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.