Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29944436›Full record

ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2018

Differential effects of light-to-dark transitions on phase setting in circadian expression among clock-controlled genes in Pharbitis nil.

R Hayama, T Mizoguchi, G Coupland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R Hayamaa Department of Plant Developmental Biology , Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research , Cologne , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0817-8351
T Mizoguchib Department of Natural Sciences , International Christian University , Tokyo , Japan.
G Couplanda Department of Plant Developmental Biology , Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research , Cologne , Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6988-4172
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEInternational Christian University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian clock is synchronized by the day-night cycle to allow plants to anticipate daily environmental changes and to recognize annual changes in day length enabling seasonal flowering. This clock system has been extensively studied in Arabidopsis thaliana and was found to be reset by the dark to light transition at dawn. By contrast, studies on photoperiodic flowering of Pharbitis nil revealed the presence of a clock system reset by the transition from light to dark at dusk to measure the duration of the night. However, a Pharbitis photosynthetic gene was also shown to be insensitive to this dusk transition and to be set by dawn. Thus Pharbitis appeared to have two clock systems, one set by dusk that controls photoperiodic flowering and a second controlling photosynthetic gene expression similar to that of Arabidopsis. Here, we show that circadian mRNA expression of Pharbitis homologs of a series of Arabidopsis clock or clock-controlled genes are insensitive to the dusk transition. These data further define the presence in Pharbitis of a clock system that is analogous to the Arabidopsis system, which co-exists and functions with the dusk-set system dedicated to the control of photoperiodic flowering.

Indexed as

DarknessLightCircadian RhythmFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantIpomoea nilPlant ProteinsPlant Proteinscircadian clockPharbitis nilphotoperiodic floweringPnCDF2PnFKF1Pn FTPnLHYPnTOC1

Identifiers

PMID29944436
PMCPMC6110364
OpenAlexW2810119939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.