Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943903›Full record

ReviewVeterinary medicine and science2018

Tick-borne relapsing fever as a potential veterinary medical problem.

Nusirat Elelu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary medicine and science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The ability of relapsing feverCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Molecular evidence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  7. Emerging Tickborne Bacteria in Cattle from Colombia.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Seroprevalence of Antibodies AgainstJournal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nusirat EleluDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-4572
University of Ilorin · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) caused by the bacteria Borrelia, is poorly documented in veterinary medicine. Given the widespread presence of the soft tick vectors - Ornithodoros and the recently discovered hard tick vectors, as well as their close association with animal hosts, it is highly likely that infection occurs, but is rarely reported to be of veterinary importance. Sporadic reports of canine infection, some being fatal through to probable cause of abortion in horses have been published. Some of these pathogens exist in regions where there are limited diagnostic facilities, hence, they are likely to be missed and their impact on productivity may be unquantified. Here we review available literatures on cases of TBRF in domestic and wild animals in order to show their potential veterinary medical impact. Future efforts using field and laboratory surveys are needed to determine pathogenesis, vector competence and distribution in animals, their impact on animal health and productivity as well as to prevent further spill to the human population, where it is already a public health problem in some parts of the world.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildBorreliaRelapsing FeverArgasidBorreliaOrnithodorosspirochaetesticks

Identifiers

PMID29943903
PMCPMC6236141
OpenAlexW2810472540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.