Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943272›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2019

Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey 2017: what did we achieve since 2015?

Luise Gaede, Lars Aarberge, George Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, Philip Macarthy, Francesco Musumeci, Pepe Zamorano, Helge Möllmann

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. European heart health survey 2019.Clinical cardiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Recurrent infective endocarditis versus first-time infective endocarditis after heart valve surgery.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Heart valve disease in elderly.World journal of cardiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Luise GaedeDepartment of Cardiology, St.-Johannes-Hospital, Medizinische Klinik I, Johannesstraße 9-13, 44137, Dortmund, Germany. luisegaede@googlemail.com.
Lars AarbergeDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
George Brandon Bravo BruinsmaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Isala Heart Centre, Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands.
Philip MacarthyKing's College London and King's College Hospital London, London, UK.
Francesco MusumeciDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Pepe ZamoranoDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal Carretera de Colmenar, Madrid, Spain.
Helge MöllmannDepartment of Cardiology, St.-Johannes-Hospital, Medizinische Klinik I, Johannesstraße 9-13, 44137, Dortmund, Germany.
St.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund · DEHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITIsala · NLKing's College London · GBOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe 2015 Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey showed a low knowledge and awareness about heart valve disease in the general population despite its high prevalence and morbidity. The 2017 survey was conducted to re-evaluate concern and knowledge about heart valve disease after 2 years of rapidly increasing patient numbers presenting with heart valve disease. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 12,820 people aged 60 years or older in 11 European countries took part in the survey. While the number of people concerned most about heart valve disease increased significantly (2015:1.7% vs. 2017:2.1%; p < 0.001), it is still very low compared to cancer (28.8%) or Alzheimer's disease (20.9%). More people claim to be familiar with heart valve disease in general (2015: 17.1% vs. 2017: 20.0%; p < 0.001) and the majority claims to know of at least one therapy for heart valve disease (61.9%). Nevertheless, only 3.8% could correctly identify aortic stenosis (AS), which is significantly less than in 2015 (7.2%; p < 0.001). As before, the majority of the respondents claimed to rarely or never undergo a stethoscope check from their general practitioner (2015: 54.2% vs. 2017: 50.6%, p < 0.001); nevertheless, a positive trend can be seen. People wish heart valve disease to be part of regular checks by the general practitioners.

conclusionThe general population's knowledge of heart valve disease in general slightly increased over the last 2 years. However, detailed understanding of aortic stenosis and its treatment options is still low, as is the level of concern shown for heart valve disease. Nevertheless, the general population cites heart valve disease as a condition they wish to be checked for regularly.

Indexed as

AwarenessSurveys and QuestionnairesEuropeFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesAortic stenosisAwarenessHeart valve diseaseKnowledgeSurvey

Identifiers

PMID29943272
OpenAlexW2809711029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.