Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943229›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2019

Is Braak staging valid for all types of Parkinson's disease?

Kurt A Jellinger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kurt A JellingerInstitute of Clinical Neurobiology, Alberichgasse 5/13, 1150, Vienna, Austria. kurt.jellinger@univie.ac.at.
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Braak et al. proposed that cases with Lewy pathology in the peripheral nervous sytem, spinal cord and brain stem are prodromal Parkinson's disease (PD), suggesting a hypothesized progression of PD pathology. However, the putative potential of peripheral α-synuclein to promote brain pathology has been questioned recently. The Braak staging is a matter of vigorous debate, since < 100% of cases with Lewy pathology fitting the proposed PD staging scheme; however, most studies assessing typical PD cases show that the vast majority (80-100%) fit the Braak staging scheme. Incidental Lewy body disease and PD can show Lewy pathology in substantia nigra or other brain areas without involvement of dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve. The Braak staging system is valid for PD patients with young onset, long duration with motor symptoms, but not for others, e.g., late onset and rapid course PD. The validity of Braak staging and its relationship to various subtypes of PD warrants further studies.

Indexed as

BrainDisease ProgressionHumansLewy BodiesParkinson DiseaseBraak stagingGuidelinesLewy body diseaseLewy pathologyParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID29943229
OpenAlexW2810263479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.