Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943225›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018

Is systematic nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy really necessary?

Elodie Gaignard, Damien Bergeat, Laetitia Courtin-Tanguy, Michel Rayar, Aude Merdrignac, Fabien Robin, Karim Boudjema, Helene Beloeil, Bernard Meunier, Laurent Sulpice

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026
    Article
  6. How to Reduce Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  7. Routine Gastric Decompression after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Treating the Surgeon?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elodie GaignardUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Damien BergeatUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Laetitia Courtin-TanguyUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Michel RayarUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Aude MerdrignacUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Fabien RobinUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Karim BoudjemaUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Helene BeloeilUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Bernard MeunierUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Laurent SulpiceUniversité de Rennes 1, F-35000, Rennes, France. laurent.sulpice@chu-rennes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-1685
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the spread of enhanced recovery programs, early withdrawal of the nasogastric tube (NGT) is recommended after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), although few data on the safety of this practice are available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the absence of nasogastric decompression after PD on postoperative outcome. STUDY

designAll consecutive patients undergoing PD between January 2014 and December 2015 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Since May 2015, all operated patients had the NGT removed immediately after the procedure (NGT- group) and were compared to patients operated before this practice (NGT+ group), who had the NGT maintained until at least postoperative day 3.

resultsDuring the study period, 139 patients underwent PD, of whom 40 (29%) were in the NGT- group and 99 (71%) were in the NGT+ group. The length of hospital stay (LOS) and rate of postoperative complications of grade 2 or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system were significantly higher in the NGT+ group [14 (11-25) vs. 10 (8-14.2), P = 0.005 and 82.8 vs. 40%, P < 0.001, respectively]. Incidence and severity of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) grade B-C were also higher in the NGT+ group (45.5 vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups concerning the 90-day postoperative mortality (P = 0.18).

conclusionThe absence of systematic nasogastric decompression after PD might reduce postoperative complications, DGE, and LOS. These encouraging results deserve to be confirmed by a prospective randomized study (NCT: 02594956).

Indexed as

Intubation, GastrointestinalPostoperative CareAgedFemaleGastric EmptyingHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic DiseasesPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsDelayed gastric emptyingEnhanced recoveryNasogastric tubePancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID29943225
OpenAlexW2810496943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.