Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943218›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2018

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer organ-preserving therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Herney Andrés García-Perdomo, Carlos Eduardo Montes-Cardona, Marcela Guacheta, Diego Fernando Castillo, Leonardo O Reis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05123625 (A Phase III Randomized Non-inferiority Multicenter Study of PLND Omission in Clinical NMIBC Undergoing Radical Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05123625 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III Randomized Non-inferiority Multicenter Study of PLND Omission in Clinical NMIBC Undergoing Radical Cystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsBladder CancerArmsReduce surgical procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of trimodality therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and effect on survival.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Herney Andrés García-PerdomoSchool of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Carlos Eduardo Montes-CardonaUROGIV Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Marcela GuachetaUROGIV Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Diego Fernando CastilloSchool of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Leonardo O ReisUroScience, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas and University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. reisleo.l@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-414X
Universidad del Valle · COUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

CNPq Research Productivity, Brazil 302622/2015-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effectiveness and harms of bladder-preserving trimodal therapy (TMT) as a first-line treatment versus radical cystectomy (RC) plus radical pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in terms of overall survival.

methodsWe included parallel clinical trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies that included patients older than 18 years old, diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, who underwent TMT compared with RC. The planned comparison was TMT versus RC plus pelvic lymphadenectomy as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were salvage cystectomy and cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival. A search strategy was designed for MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, and LILACS. We saturated information with conference abstracts, in progress clinical trials, literature published in non-indexed journals, and other sources of gray literature. Standardized tools assessed the risk of bias independently. We performed the statistical analysis in R v3.4.1 and effect sizes were reported in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Accordingly, we used a random effect model due to the statistical heterogeneity found in included studies.

resultsWe found 2682 records with the search strategies and, finally, 11 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The summary HR for OS was 1.06 95%CI (0.85-1.31) I

conclusionWe found no differences in overall survival and progression-free survival between these two interventions. Nonetheless, we found that cancer-specific survival favored patients who received radical cystectomy.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Transitional CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantCystectomyCystoscopyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMuscle, SmoothNeoplasm InvasivenessProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival RateUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBladder preservingCancerMuscle invasiveRadical cystectomyTrimodal

Identifiers

PMID29943218
OpenAlexW2810154676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.