Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943152›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Incidence of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy regimens in Italy: NAVY observational study.

Michelino De Laurentiis, Chiara Bonfadini, Vito Lorusso, Giuseppina Cilenti, Francesca Di Rella, Giuseppe Altavilla, Manuela Otero, Antonio Ardizzoia, Paolo Marchetti, Giorgia Peverelli and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting guideline adherence in pediatric and adult patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Palonosetron in pediatric patients: A single-center, retrospective evaluation of policy and clinical practice guideline discordance.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Michelino De LaurentiisDivision of Breast Medical Oncology, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy. delauren@me.com.
Chiara BonfadiniMedical Oncology Department, "A.O.U. Città della Scienza e della Salute di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Vito LorussoMedical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppina CilentiOncohematology Hospital "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Francesca Di RellaMedical Oncology, Department of Senology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione G.Pascale Naples, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe AltavillaHuman Pathology Department, Medical Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Manuela OteroOncology Division, AORN "Cardarelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonio ArdizzoiaOncology Department, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiClinical and Molecular Medicine Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giorgia PeverelliMedical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Domenico AmorosoMedical Oncology, Ospedale Versilia, Tuscan Tumor Institute (ITT), Lido di Camaiore, Italy.
Stefania VecchioOncologia Medica 2, IRCCS San Martino IST, Genoa, Italy.
Elena FiorioDepartment of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Simona OrecchiaMedical Affairs Department, MSD Italy, Rome, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITAziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali di LeccoCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITMSD (Italy) · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale Versilia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common adverse event with cancer chemotherapy, despite the availability of effective antiemetic agents. This is a prospective observational study of Italian breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC), assessed CINV incidence, adherence to national antiemetic guidelines (AIOM 2012), and the relationship with CINV outcomes.

methodsPatients with breast cancer scheduled to receive their first cycle of an AC-based regimen were enrolled at 12 Italian centers and their clinical data prospectively recorded. CINV incidence was assessed from patient diaries after the first chemotherapy cycle. The relationship between guideline adherence and CINV outcomes was examined using multiple logistic regression.

resultsThe overall incidence rates of nausea and vomiting among 246 evaluable patients were 63.0 and 25.4%, respectively. Most patients received a 5-HT3-RA agent and dexamethasone for acute phase CINV prophylaxis, whereas a triple combination including aprepitant (NK1-RA), consistent with national guidelines, was used in only 45.5% of cases. In the delayed phase, the guideline adherence was 48.8%, while the overall adherence was 43.5%. After adjusting for confounding factors, adherence to antiemetic prophylaxis guidelines was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of three endpoints, namely any nausea, "significant nausea," and vomiting (OR = 0.49, OR = 0.54, and OR = 0.48, respectively), and a 90% increase in the odds of overall complete protection (OR = 1.90).

conclusionsCINV is still a critical issue in AC-treated patients, despite antiemetic treatment. Non-adherence to antiemetic guidelines may lead to poorer outcomes and indicates the need for strategies to enhance the use of guidelines in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntiemeticsBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMiddle AgedNauseaProspective StudiesVomitingAnthracyclinesAntiemeticsCyclophosphamideCancer chemotherapyGuidelinesNauseaOutcomesVomiting

Identifiers

PMID29943152
OpenAlexW2811428499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.