Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943142›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2019

H Hop, S A de Boer, M Reijrink, P W Kamphuisen, M H de Borst, R A Pol, C J Zeebregts, J L Hillebrands, R H J A Slart, H H Boersma and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Molecular imaging of carotid artery atherosclerosis with PET: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pericarotid Fat as a Marker of Cerebrovascular Risk.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Radiology · 2022
    Observational
  10. [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and morphological criteria of vulnerability in carotid artery plaque using hybridJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Carotid plaque stenosis, metabolism and flow dynamics: Important determinants of atherosclerotic risk?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Determinants ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Clinical implications ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Dynamic monitoring of active calcification in atherosclerosis byThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H HopDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. h.hop@umcg.nl.
S A de BoerDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M ReijrinkDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P W KamphuisenDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M H de BorstDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
R A PolDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
C J ZeebregtsDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J L HillebrandsDivision of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
R H J A SlartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H H BoersmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J DoorduinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
D J MulderDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsCarotid plaques from stroke patients undergoing surgery were incubated in

results23 carotid plaques (17 culprit, 6 non-culprit) were included. The average

conclusions

Indexed as

AgedCalcinosisCarotid ArteriesCarotid StenosisFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRisk AssessmentSodium FluorideTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Ray MicrotomographyFluorine RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsSodium Fluoride18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF)CalcificationCarotid artery stenosisPET/CT imagingVulnerable atherosclerotic plaque

Identifiers

PMID29943142
PMCPMC6660502
OpenAlexW2811103494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.