Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943123›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2019

Comparisons of New HIV Rapid Test Kit Performance.

Dennis G Fisher, Kristen L Hess, Grace L Reynolds, Todd A Alonzo, Loucine M Huckabay, Lucy Van Otterloo, David W Hosmer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dennis G FisherCenter for Behavioral Research and Services, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA. Dennis.Fisher@csulb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-2207
Kristen L HessCenter for Behavioral Research and Services, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Grace L ReynoldsCenter for Behavioral Research and Services, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Todd A AlonzoChildren's Oncology Group, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Monrovia, CA, USA.
Loucine M HuckabaySchool of Nursing, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Lucy Van OtterlooSchool of Nursing, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
David W HosmerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Stowe, VT, USA.

Funding

RIMI-CSULBP20MD003942 · NIMHD · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI CONOLEY, JANE CLOSE · 2009 to 2013
$4.6M
Supplement to Behavioral Science AspectsR01DA030234 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI FISHER, DENNIS G · 2010 to 2013
$1.8M
California HIV/AIDS Research Program ID10-CSULB-008National Institute on Drug Abuse R01DA030234NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030234NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD003942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of rapid point-of-care tests for HIV infection has greatly reduced the problem of failure to return for test results. Test manufacturers are now developing test kits that can test for two or even three diseases at the same time, multiple-disease test kits. This study reports on the sensitivity and specificity of HIV tests when included on multi-disease test kits. 1029 participants were recruited from 2011 to 2014. HIV test kit sensitivities ranged from 91.1 to 100%, and the HIV test kit specificities from 99.5 to 100%. The two HIV kits which used oral fluid instead of blood performed well.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care TestingSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultReagent Kits, DiagnosticHIV testingPoint-of-care testsRapid tests

Identifiers

PMID29943123
PMCPMC6309759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.