Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943100›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2019

Evaluation of the effect of combined intravitreal ranibizumab injection and sub-tenon steroid injection in the treatment of resistant diabetic macular edema.

Erdem Eriş, Irfan Perente, Esra Vural, Aslı Vural, Zeynep Seymen, Ali Rıza Cenk Celebi, Gurkan Erdogan, Abdullah Ozkaya, Ozgur Artunay

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erdem ErişBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Bereketzade Cami Sok., 34421, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey. erdem-eris@hotmail.com.
Irfan PerenteBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Bereketzade Cami Sok., 34421, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Esra VuralDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mardin State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.
Aslı VuralBakırkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep SeymenSuleymaniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Rıza Cenk CelebiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gurkan ErdoganBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Bereketzade Cami Sok., 34421, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah OzkayaBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Bereketzade Cami Sok., 34421, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozgur ArtunayBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Bereketzade Cami Sok., 34421, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Beyoglu Goz Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi · TRAcıbadem University · TRBakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRİstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRMardin Artuklu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare sub-tenon steroid plus anti-VEGF injection with anti-VEGF injection solely in the treatment of resistant diabetic macular edema (DME).

methodPatients who exhibited insufficient anatomic [over 350 μm central macular thickness (CMT)] and less than 3 lines of visual gain at least six anti-VEGF injections, were randomly divided into two groups. In group I, the anti-VEGF injection was performed 10 days after the sub-tenon steroid injection [Triamcinolone acetonide (Sinakort-A

resultsThe baseline BCVA in group I and group II was 0.51 ± 0.667 logMAR and 0.47 ± 0.60 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.52). In group I and II, at the end of 6-month follow-up, BCVA improved to 0.38 ± 0.60 logMAR (p < 0.001) and 0.43 ± 0.60 logMAR (p = 0.20), respectively. The baseline CMT in group I and group II was 494 ± 118.32 and 438.20 ± 90.99 μm, respectively (p = 0.029). In group I and II, at the end of 6 months, CMT decreased to 302.57 ± 69.89 μm (p < 0.001) and 439.20 ± 107.6 μm (p = 0.96), respectively.

conclusionAdding steroid to routine anti-VEGF treatment is an effective way of treatment method for resistant DME.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsCase-Control StudiesDiabetic RetinopathyDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsGlucocorticoidsRanibizumabTriamcinolone AcetonideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACombined treatmentDiabeticRanibizumabResistant macular edemaSteroid

Identifiers

PMID29943100
OpenAlexW2810368490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.