ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019
[Critical discussion on the current quality debate on long-term care-a plea for a systemic and empirical insight into the development and measurement of quality in long-term care].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity- and culturally sensitive approaches in nutrition and fluid management in long-term nursing. A scoping review.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- [Attitudes to publication of quality testing reports in nursing homes].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the background of the quality debates on long-term care and recurrent reform measures in politics on this topic, a critical discussion on the current state of quality development, testing and reporting in Germany is presented. In Germany, the linear model of Donabedian's structural, process and outcome quality is still used as a basis for quality issues in nursing care; however, international research suggests that multiple and mutually interacting factors influence nursing quality and that a more systematic and systemic perspective for the further development of nursing quality (especially of features, criteria and indicators of nursing quality) appears more appropriate. This article intends to open the perspective of the development, measurement and reporting of quality in nursing and to make a critical contribution for a systemic theory development as a relevant basis for future developments of quality evaluation programs and quality reporting systems in long-term care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29943079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.