Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29943074›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2018

ADMETlab: a platform for systematic ADMET evaluation based on a comprehensively collected ADMET database.

Jie Dong, Ning-Ning Wang, Zhi-Jiang Yao, Lin Zhang, Yan Cheng, Defang Ouyang, Ai-Ping Lu, Dong-Sheng Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 267 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
267citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

267 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie DongXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Ning-Ning WangXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Jiang YaoXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Lin ZhangHunan Key Laboratory of Processed Food for Special Medical Purpose, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Yan ChengXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Defang OuyangState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences (ICMS), University of Macau, Macau, People's Republic of China.
Ai-Ping LuInstitute for Advancing Translational Medicine in Bone & Joint Diseases, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.
Dong-Sheng CaoXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, People's Republic of China. oriental-cds@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-3785

Funding

National Key Basic Research Program 2015CB910700National Natural Science Foundation of China 81402853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) is a high-risk investment which is usually faced with some unexpected even disastrous failures in different stages of drug discovery. One main reason for R&D failures is the efficacy and safety deficiencies which are related largely to absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties and various toxicities (T). Therefore, rapid ADMET evaluation is urgently needed to minimize failures in the drug discovery process. Here, we developed a web-based platform called ADMETlab for systematic ADMET evaluation of chemicals based on a comprehensively collected ADMET database consisting of 288,967 entries. Four function modules in the platform enable users to conveniently perform six types of drug-likeness analysis (five rules and one prediction model), 31 ADMET endpoints prediction (basic property: 3, absorption: 6, distribution: 3, metabolism: 10, elimination: 2, toxicity: 7), systematic evaluation and database/similarity searching. We believe that this web platform will hopefully facilitate the drug discovery process by enabling early drug-likeness evaluation, rapid ADMET virtual screening or filtering and prioritization of chemical structures. The ADMETlab web platform is designed based on the Django framework in Python, and is freely accessible at http://admet.scbdd.com/ .

Indexed as

ADMETADMET databaseADMETlabCheminformaticsDrug discoveryDrug-likeness

Identifiers

PMID29943074
PMCPMC6020094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.