Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942813›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2018

The venous ulcer continues to be a clinical challenge: an update.

Ting Xie, Junna Ye, Kittipan Rerkasem, Rajgopal Mani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04834232 (Comparative Study Between Iliac Vein Stenting and Compression Therapy in Recurrent Venous Ulceration), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04834232 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Iliac Vein Stenting and Compression Therapy in Recurrent Venous Ulceration

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsVenous Ulcer RecurrentArmscompression therapy, iliac vein stenting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wound cleansing for treating venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Patient Education Program on Venous Leg Ulcer Healing: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nonhealing venous ulcer in a patient with dystrophic soft tissue calcification.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Virulence and Drug-Resistance ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ting Xie1Wound Healing Centre at Emergency Department, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junna Ye2Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kittipan Rerkasem3NCD Centre of Excellence, Research Institute of Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Rajgopal Mani4NCD Centre and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-7402
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous ulcers are a common chronic problem in many countries especially in Northern Europe and USA. The overall prevalence of this condition is 1% rising to 3% in the over 65 years of age. Over the last 25 years, there have been many developments applicable to its diagnosis and treatment. These advances, notwithstanding healing response and recurrence, are variable, and the venous ulcer continues to be a clinical challenge. The pathogenesis of venous ulcers is unrelieved or ambulatory venous hypertension resulting mostly from deep venous thrombosis leading to venous incompetence, lipodermatosclerosis, leucocyte plugging of the capillaries, tissue hypoxia and microvascular dysfunction. It is not known what initiates venous ulcers. Triggers vary from trauma of the lower extremity to scratching to relieve itchy skin over the ankle region. Venous ulcers can be painful, and this condition presents an increasing burden of care. A systematic analysis of the role of technology used for diagnosis and management strongly supports the use of compression as a mainstay of standardised care. It further shows good evidence for the potential of some treatment procedures to accelerate healing. This article reviews the pathogenetic mechanisms, current diagnostic methods and standard care and its limitations.

Indexed as

LipodermatosclerosisMicrocirculatory dysfunctionTechnology guidelinesVenous hypertensionVenous ulcer

Identifiers

PMID29942813
PMCPMC6003071
OpenAlexW2807929228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.