Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942662›Full record

ReviewESMO open2018

30 Immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC-from the 'tsunami' of therapeutic knowledge to a clinical practice algorithm: results from an international expert panel meeting of the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT).

Filippo de Marinis, Fortunato Ciardiello, Paul Baas, Lucio Crinò, Giuseppe Giaccone, Francesco Grossi, Matthew D Hellmann, Tony S K Mok, Hervè Lena, Luis Paz-Ares and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Introducing a newESMO open · 2019
    Article
  9. HGF/MET and the Immune System: Relevance for Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Filippo de MarinisDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F. Magrassi & A. Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Caserta, Italy.
Paul BaasDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lucio CrinòIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meloda, Italy.
Giuseppe GiacconeDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Francesco GrossiLung Cancer Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Matthew D HellmannDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Tony S K MokState Key Laboratory of South China, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Hervè LenaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Luis Paz-AresInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Delvys Rodriguez-AbreuHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.
Joachim Von PavelDepartment of Pneumology, Asklepios Hospital Munich-Gauting, Munich, Germany.
Cesare GridelliDivision of Medical Oncology, 'S.G. Moscati' Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
Asklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting · DEAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRChinese University of Hong Kong · CNEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITGeorgetown University Medical Center · USHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria · ESIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although lung cancer remains the leading cause of death from cancer worldwide, the advent of immunotherapy is changing the survival of patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A multitude of clinical trials are evaluating different immune checkpoints inhibitors in this new field of thoracic oncology. At the beginning of the immunotherapy era, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab showed high efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC in second-line setting, receiving approvals for clinical practice. Nivolumab and atezolizumab are approved independently from programmed death lig and 1 (PD-L1) expression, while pembrolizumab is currently approved only for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. The role of PD-L1 expression acquired more interest considering first-line clinical trials, in which the role of immunotherapy as monotherapy was confirmed only for pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. These data were analysed in this paper, focusing on the implications in clinical practice and how to use them to an accurate clinical benefit of patients with advanced NSCLC. We report a review based on a MEDLINE/PubMed, searched for randomised phase 2/3 trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors and NSCLC, that moved to an approval from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMA). The evidence discussed in this manuscript and the final therapeutic algorithm, coming out from an International Experts Panel Meeting of the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology.

Indexed as

algorithmatezolizumabimmunotherapynivolumabNSCLCpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID29942662
PMCPMC6012561
OpenAlexW2806207291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.