ArticleDigital health
Co-constructed health narratives during a 'media event': The case of the first Dutch Twitter heart operation.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gaming healthcare practitioner: How practices of datafication and gamification reconfigure care.Health informatics journal · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis article examines the relationship between microblogging and the development of health narrative through the lens of an institution-initiated media event, the first live-tweeted heart operation in the Netherlands. It specifically addresses the question, how does health narrative take shape on a microblog and other (social) media, through the combination of self-initiated status updates, reactions to questions and short conversations with followers?
methodsA combination of qualitative and quantitative data analysis was used to identify prominent themes in the tweets and trace the complex process by which the narrative took shape. The results presented here are derived from the qualitative analysis.
resultsThere are four recurring health narrative themes in the tweets: (a) new challenges to professionalism; (b) mutual exchanges of information, support and advice; (c) increasingly personal (and public) details; and (d) questions about 'resuming normalcy'. The special nature of this case also reveals interesting features, such as the multiple narrative starting points and the phenomenon of 'tweeting by proxy', and raises a number of critical questions regarding this type of use of social media in healthcare.
conclusionsIn the discussion we reflect on whether/how microblogged health narratives are really 'new' and on the implications of this single case for understanding the relationship between social media, health narrative and the changing relationships between information technologies, actors and institutions. We further examine this case as an example of what Lupton has deemed the 'digital patient experience economy', in reference to patients increasingly being encouraged to post experiences of their illness and encounters with the healthcare system to online platforms, where these shared experiences become valorised and monetised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.