Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942419›Full record

ArticleWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics

Computational methods for birth-death processes.

Forrest W Crawford, Lam Si Tung Ho, Marc A Suchard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Forrest W CrawfordDepartments of Biostatistics, Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, and School of Management, Yale University.
Lam Si Tung HoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Marc A SuchardDepartments of Biomathematics, Biostatistics and Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USYale University · US

Funding

Genomics, GPUs, and Next Generation Computational StatisticsR01HG006139 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SOBEL, ERIC · 2011 to 2023
$5.1M
Systems in Integrative BiologyT32GM008185 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHOU, TOM · 1987 to 2022
$4.6M
Network-based epidemiology for hidden and hard-to-reach populationsDP2HD091799 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CRAWFORD, FORREST WRENN · 2016 to 2016
$2.5M
BAYESIAN MODELING AND DATA INTEGRATION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE PHYLODYNAMICSR01AI107034 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MININ, VOLODYMYR · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006139NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI107034NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD091799NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many important stochastic counting models can be written as general birth-death processes (BDPs). BDPs are continuous-time Markov chains on the non-negative integers in which only jumps to adjacent states are allowed. BDPs can be used to easily parameterize a rich variety of probability distributions on the non-negative integers, and straightforward conditions guarantee that these distributions are proper. BDPs also provide a mechanistic interpretation - birth and death of actual particles or organisms - that has proven useful in evolution, ecology, physics, and chemistry. Although the theoretical properties of general BDPs are well understood, traditionally statistical work on BDPs has been limited to the simple linear (Kendall) process. Aside from a few simple cases, it remains impossible to find analytic expressions for the likelihood of a discretely-observed BDP, and computational difficulties have hindered development of tools for statistical inference. But the gap between BDP theory and practical methods for estimation has narrowed in recent years. There are now robust methods for evaluating likelihoods for realizations of BDPs: finite-time transition, first passage, equilibrium probabilities, and distributions of summary statistics that arise commonly in applications. Recent work has also exploited the connection between continuously- and discretely-observed BDPs to derive EM algorithms for maximum likelihood estimation. Likelihood-based inference for previously intractable BDPs is much easier than previously thought and regression approaches analogous to Poisson regression are straightforward to derive. In this review, we outline the basic mathematical theory for BDPs and demonstrate new tools for statistical inference using data from BDPs.

Identifiers

PMID29942419
PMCPMC6014701
OpenAlexW2781990454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.