ReviewJournal of foot and ankle research2018
Sociology of the professions: what it means for podiatry.
Review in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blocked paths, unequal trajectories: Examining the career outcomes of health professions graduates by race, gender, and place of education.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Overcoming uncertainty: A framework to guide the implementation of Australian radiation therapy advanced practitioners.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2023Article
- Allied health assistants' perspectives of their role in healthcare settings: A qualitative study.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Exploring the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging by podiatrists: an international survey.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2021Article
- The changing landscape of professional practice in podiatry, lessons to be learned from other professions about the barriers to change - a narrative review.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2019Review
- Factors perceived to influence implementation of task shifting in highly specialised healthcare: a theory-based qualitative approach.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe health professions have progressed and evolved considerably over the last few decades in response to demographic, technological, societal and political changes. They continue to do so as the volume and complexity of population health needs steadily increase. Role boundary expansion is among the key changes to the health professions, including podiatry to meet demand. Nonetheless podiatry's role boundary expansion has not been achieved swiftly or without resistance from neighbouring and dominant professions. This paper seeks to explain the nature of this resistance with respect to the sociology of the professions literature and to shed light on some of the factors and processes at play when role boundary changes arise in health care. DISCUSSION: Six of the most contemporaneously relevant sociology of the professions theories are summarised:
conclusionThis review highlights that some paradigms are more relevant than others in the current socio-political landscape. It also illustrates that there is a common theme underlying each approach to defining the professions and their boundaries: competition. This may help health professionals, including podiatrists, to understand and manage the challenges and resistance experienced when professions attempt to expand role boundaries to meet increasing and changing population health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.