Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942343›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2018

Occupational infection and needle stick injury among clinical laboratory workers in Al-Madinah city, Saudi Arabia.

Omar F Khabour, Khalil H Al Ali, Waleed H Mahallawi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Surveillance of laboratory exposures to human pathogens and toxins, Canada, 2024.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Surveillance of laboratory exposures to human pathogens and toxins, Canada, 2023.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar F Khabour1Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, 41477 Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3006-3104
Khalil H Al Ali1Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, 41477 Saudi Arabia.
Waleed H Mahallawi1Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, 41477 Saudi Arabia.
Taibah University · SAJordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical laboratory workers face biohazard such as needlestick injury and occupational infection on a daily basis. In this study, we examined self-reported frequency of occupational infection and needlestick injury among the clinical laboratory workers in Al- Madinah, Saudi Arabia.

methodsA total of 234 clinical laboratory workers were recruited from private and government health sectors to answer a self-administered questionnaire that was prepared to achieve the aims of the study.

resultsThe results showed that approximately 33% of the sample had an experienced occupational infection while 24% had experienced a needlestick injury. Approximately, 49% reported that they always recap needle after use, whereas 15% reported doing that most of the times. Occupational infection, needlestick injury and recapping needles after use were associated with lack of training on biosafety (

conclusionThe frequency of occupational infection and needlestick injury among clinical laboratory workers in Al-Madinah is high. Interventions related to biosafety and infection control and the use of needlestick prevention devices might be useful in lowering such frequency.

Indexed as

Al-MadinahBiosafetyClinical laboratoryNeedlestickOccupational infection

Identifiers

PMID29942343
PMCPMC5963129
OpenAlexW2807221037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.