Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942114›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Argus II retinal prosthesis system: a review of patient selection criteria, surgical considerations, and post-operative outcomes.

Avni P Finn, Dilraj S Grewal, Lejla Vajzovic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Brain-computer interface commercialization.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Seeing the Future: A Review of Ocular Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Avni P FinnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Dilraj S GrewalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Lejla VajzovicDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a group of heterogeneous inherited retinal degenerative disorders characterized by progressive rod and cone dysfunction and ensuing photoreceptor loss. Many patients suffer from legal blindness by their 40s or 50s. Artificial vision is considered once patients have lost all vision to the point of bare light perception or no light perception. The Argus II retinal prosthesis system is one such artificial vision device approved for patients with RP. This review focuses on the factors important for patient selection. Careful pre-operative screening, counseling, and management of patient expectations are critical for the successful implantation and visual rehabilitation of patients with the Argus II device.

Indexed as

artificial visionlow visionpatient selectionretinal degenerationretinal prosthesisretinitis pigmentosavision rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29942114
PMCPMC6005308
OpenAlexW2808485090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.