Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942074›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2018

Experimental evidence for rapid genomic adaptation to a new niche in an adaptive radiation.

David A Marques, Felicity C Jones, Federica Di Palma, David M Kingsley, Thomas E Reimchen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Complex evolutionary processes maintain an ancient chromosomal inversion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic changes underlying repeated niche shifts in an adaptive radiation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

David A MarquesDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. david.marques@eawag.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4590-4575
Felicity C JonesDepartment of Developmental Biology, HHMI and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Federica Di PalmaEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
David M KingsleyDepartment of Developmental Biology, HHMI and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Thomas E ReimchenDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
University of Victoria · CAMax Planck Society · DEStanford University · USUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Genomic Basis of Vertebrate DiversityP50HG002568 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 2002 to 2011
$29.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial part of biodiversity is thought to have arisen from adaptive radiations in which one lineage rapidly diversified into multiple lineages specialized to many different niches. However, selection and drift reduce genetic variation during adaptation to new niches and may thus prevent or slow down further niche shifts. We tested whether rapid adaptation is still possible from a highly derived ecotype in the adaptive radiation of threespine stickleback on the Haida Gwaii archipelago, Western Canada. In a 19-year selection experiment, we let giant sticklebacks from a large blackwater lake evolve in a small clearwater pond without vertebrate predators. A total of 56 whole genomes from the experiment and 26 natural populations revealed that adaptive genomic change was rapid in many small genomic regions and encompassed 75% of the change between 12,000-year-old ecotypes. Genomic change was as fast as phenotypic change in defence and trophic morphology, and both were largely parallel between the short-term selection experiment and long-term natural adaptive radiation. Our results show that functionally relevant standing genetic variation can persist in derived radiation members, allowing adaptive radiations to unfold very rapidly.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionEcosystemGenomeAnimalsBritish ColumbiaFemaleLakesSmegmamorpha

Identifiers

PMID29942074
PMCPMC6519129
OpenAlexW2809337805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.