Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942039›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2018

Investigating large-scale brain dynamics using field potential recordings: analysis and interpretation.

Bijan Pesaran, Martin Vinck, Gaute T Einevoll, Anton Sirota, Pascal Fries, Markus Siegel, Wilson Truccolo, Charles E Schroeder, Ramesh Srinivasan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distinct laminar origins of sensory-evoked high-gamma and low-frequency ECoG signals revealed by optogenetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Saccade-related LFP power transients in the primate amygdala and hippocampus linked to the perception of social status.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural synchrony links sensorimotor cortices in a network for facial motor control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Ephaptic coupling and power fluctuations in depression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bijan PesaranCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA. bijan@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-0038
Martin VinckErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gaute T EinevollFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Anton SirotaBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich, Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Pascal FriesErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4270-1468
Markus SiegelCentre for Integrative Neuroscience & MEG Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5115-936X
Wilson TruccoloDepartment of Neuroscience and Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Charles E SchroederTranslational Neuroscience Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Ramesh SrinivasanDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Defining Neuronal Circuits and Cellular Processes Underlying Resting fMRI SignalsR01MH111439 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2020
$5.1M
Optimizing flexible, active electrode arrays for chronic, large-scale recording and stimulation on the scale of 100,000 electrodesU01NS099697 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BRAUN, PAUL, PESARAN, BIJAN · 2016 to 2018
$3.5M
Predictive models of brain dynamics during decision making and their validation using distributed optogenetic stimulationR01NS104923 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KIANI, ROOZBEH · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Multi-Scale Cortical Dynamics in Human EpilepsyR01NS079533 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI TRUCCOLO, WILSON · 2012 to 2022
$3.4M
Multiple spatial representations during visually-guided behaviorR01EY024067 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PESARAN, BIJAN · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
neurophysiology behavioral role and organization of the auditory parabeltR01DC015780 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI KAJIKAWA, YOSHINAO · 2017 to 2023
$1.7M
Multi-Scale Cortical Dynamics and Seizure Prediction in Human Focal EpilepsyI01RX000668 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRUCCOLO, WILSON · 2015 to 2018
–
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024067NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015780NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111439NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079533NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104923NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099697RRD VA I01 RX000668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New technologies to record electrical activity from the brain on a massive scale offer tremendous opportunities for discovery. Electrical measurements of large-scale brain dynamics, termed field potentials, are especially important to understanding and treating the human brain. Here, our goal is to provide best practices on how field potential recordings (electroencephalograms, magnetoencephalograms, electrocorticograms and local field potentials) can be analyzed to identify large-scale brain dynamics, and to highlight critical issues and limitations of interpretation in current work. We focus our discussion of analyses around the broad themes of activation, correlation, communication and coding. We provide recommendations for interpreting the data using forward and inverse models. The forward model describes how field potentials are generated by the activity of populations of neurons. The inverse model describes how to infer the activity of populations of neurons from field potential recordings. A recurring theme is the challenge of understanding how field potentials reflect neuronal population activity given the complexity of the underlying brain systems.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29942039
PMCPMC7386068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.