ArticleScientific reports2018
Influencing the adhesion properties and wettability of mucin protein films by variation of the environmental pH.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From nanoparticles to crystals: one-pot programmable biosynthesis of photothermal gold structures and their use for biomedical applications.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- Computational characterization of inhaled droplet transport to the nasopharynx.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Measurement of molten chocolate friction under simulated tongue-palate kinematics: Effect of cocoa solids content and aeration.Current research in food science · 2020Article
- Novel biodegradable and non-fouling systems for controlled-release based on poly(ε-caprolactone)/Quercetin blends and biomimetic bacterial S-layer coatings.RSC advances · 2019Article
- In Vitro Studies on Zinc Binding and Buffering by Intestinal Mucins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mucins, the main component of the mucus secretions of goblet and epithelial cells, are known for exhibiting a different behaviour in accordance with their surrounding environment (i.e. among others the environmental pH), which induces a drastic change in their measured mechanical properties. In this work, we have first employed Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) in Force Spectroscopy mode to evaluate the adhesion of porcine mucin films at the nanoscale, and the changes caused in this particular factor by a pH variation between 7.0 and 4.0, both quite common values in biological conditions. Measurements also involved additional varying factors such as the indenting tip chemistry (hydrophobic vs hydrophilic), its residence time on the measured film (0, 1 and/or 2 seconds), and increasing pulling rates (ranging from 0.1 up to 10 µm/s). A second approach regarded the macroscale behaviour of the films, due to their potential applicability in the development of a new set of stimuli-responsive biomaterials. This was possible by means of complementary Wilhelmy plate method (to test the wetting properties) and cell proliferation studies on films previously exposed to the corresponding pH solution. According to our results, treatment with lowest pH (4.0) provides porcine mucin with a more hydrophilic character, showing a much stronger adhesion for analogous chemistries, as well as enhanced capability for cell attachment and proliferation, which opens new pathways for their future use and consideration as scaffold-forming material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.