ArticleScientific reports2018
A genome-wide mutation analysis method enabling high-throughput identification of chemical mutagen signatures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms and applications of N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in animal tumor models: current situation and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Duplex-Repair enables highly accurate sequencing, despite DNA damage.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Hawk-Seq™ differentiates between various mutations in Salmonella typhimurium TA100 strain caused by exposure to Ames test-positive mutagens.Mutagenesis · 2021Article
- New horizons of DNA adductome for exploring environmental causes of cancer.Cancer science · 2021Review
- The State-of-the Art of Environmental Toxicogenomics: Challenges and Perspectives of "Omics" Approaches Directed to Toxicant Mixtures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trinucleotide mutational signatures extracted from cancer genomes provide clues useful in understanding the roles of mutagens and mutagenic mechanisms in cancer development. The lack of a simple method for genome-wide analysis of alterations induced by mutagens hampers the identification of trinucleotide signatures of mutagen exposure and evaluation of their relationships with human cancers. Here, we describe a novel approach to facilitate analysis of chemically induced mutations in bacterial cells by detection of increased frequencies of base substitutions after mutagen exposure, using paired-end overlapping next-generation sequencing. DNA samples from Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100, exposed to three alkylating agents, ethylnitrosourea (ENU), methylnitrosourea (MNU), and ethyl methansulphonate (EMS), were analysed. The G:C > A:T mutation frequency was increased in all samples, whereas A:T base pair substitution frequencies were increased specifically in samples exposed to ENU, consistent with previous reports. Mutation patterns in the context of 96 possible trinucleotide formats in these samples exhibited a sharp peak corresponding to an NpCpY consensus sequence, which is similar to the mutational signature of alkylating agents in human cancer. These results indicate that our approach can be useful in facilitating the understanding of mechanisms underlying chemical mutagenicity and for identification of unknown causal mutagens in human cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.