Biomaterials driving repair after stroke.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Biomaterials for Modulating the Immune Microenvironment in Rheumatoid Arthritis.BME frontiers · 2025
   Review
2. Hydrogel oxygen reservoirs increase functional integration of neural stem cell grafts by meeting metabolic demands.Nature communications · 2023
   Article
3. Capturing Cytokines with Advanced Materials: A Potential Strategy to Tackle COVID-19 Cytokine Storm.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
   Review
4. Biomimetic Materials and Their Utility in Modeling the 3-Dimensional Neural Environment.iScience · 2020
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Dual-function injectable angiogenic biomaterial for the repair of brain tissue following stroke.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as