Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29941733›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018

Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study # 4: Accuracy and utility of photorefraction for refractive error correction in tribal Odisha (India) school screening.

Sandeep Reddy, Lapam Panda, Anjul Kumar, Suryasmita Nayak, Taraprasad Das

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pediatric eye screening - Why, when, and how.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep ReddySrimati Kanuri Shantamma Centre for Vitreoretianl Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Lapam PandaIndian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar; NMB Eye Centre and JK Center for Tribal Eye Disease, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Rayagada, Odisha, India.
Anjul KumarSrimati Kanuri Shantamma Centre for Vitreoretianl Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Suryasmita NayakNMB Eye Centre and JK Center for Tribal Eye Disease, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Rayagada, Odisha, India.
Taraprasad DasSrimati Kanuri Shantamma Centre for Vitreoretianl Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana; Indian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the photorefraction system (Welch Allyn Spot™) performance with subjective refraction in school sight program in one Odisha (India) tribal district. Methods: In a cross-sectional study school students, aged 5-15 years, referred after the preliminary screening by trained school teachers received photoscreening and subjective correction. The photoscreener was compared to subjective refraction in the range of +2D to -7.5D. Statistical analysis included Friedman nonparametric test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plotting. Results: The photoscreener was used in 5990 children. This analysis included 443 children (187 males, 256 females, and the mean age was 12.43 ± 2.5 years) who received both photorefraction and subjective correction, and vision improved to 6/6 in either eye. The median spherical equivalent (SE) with spot photorefraction was 0.00 D (minimum -5.0D; maximum +1.6 D), and with subjective correction was 0.00D (minimum -6.00 D; maximum +1.5 D). The difference in the SE between the two methods was statistically significant (P < 0.001) using Friedman nonparametric test; it was not significant for J 45 and J 180 (P = 0.39 and P = 0.17, respectively). There was a good correlation in linear regression analysis (R Conclusion: Photorefraction may be recommended for autorefraction in school screening with reasonable accuracy if verified with a satisfactory subjective correction. The added advantages include its speed, need of less expensive eye care personnel, ability to refract both eyes together, and examination possibility in the native surrounding.

Indexed as

Refraction, OcularSchoolsStudentsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMorbidityRefractive ErrorsVision ScreeningPhotorefractionschoolvision screening

Identifiers

PMID29941733
PMCPMC6032762
OpenAlexW2810926332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.