Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29941596›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Mouse maternal protein restriction during preimplantation alone permanently alters brain neuron proportion and adult short-term memory.

Joanna M Gould, Phoebe J Smith, Chris J Airey, Emily J Mort, Lauren E Airey, Frazer D M Warricker, Jennifer E Pearson-Farr, Eleanor C Weston, Philippa J W Gould, Oliver G Semmence and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna M GouldClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Phoebe J SmithClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Chris J AireyClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Emily J MortBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Lauren E AireyClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Frazer D M WarrickerClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jennifer E Pearson-FarrBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Eleanor C WestonBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Philippa J W GouldBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Oliver G SemmenceBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Katie L RestallClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jennifer A WattsBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Patrick C McHughCentre for Biomarker Research, University of Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Stephanie J SmithCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jennifer M DewingClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Tom P FlemingCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom.
Sandrine Willaime-MorawekClinical Neurosciences and Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD Southampton, United Kingdom; s.willaime-morawek@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-6419
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F007450/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I001840/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal protein malnutrition throughout pregnancy and lactation compromises brain development in late gestation and after birth, affecting structural, biochemical, and pathway dynamics with lasting consequences for motor and cognitive function. However, the importance of nutrition during the preimplantation period for brain development is unknown. We have previously shown that maternal low-protein diet (LPD) confined to the preimplantation period (Emb-LPD) in mice, with normal nutrition thereafter, is sufficient to induce cardiometabolic and locomotory behavioral abnormalities in adult offspring. Here, using a range of in vivo and in vitro techniques, we report that Emb-LPD and sustained LPD reduce neural stem cell (NSC) and progenitor cell numbers at E12.5, E14.5, and E17.5 through suppressed proliferation rates in both ganglionic eminences and cortex of the fetal brain. Moreover, Emb-LPD causes remaining NSCs to up-regulate the neuronal differentiation rate beyond control levels, whereas in LPD, apoptosis increases to possibly temper neuron formation. Furthermore, Emb-LPD adult offspring maintain the increase in neuron proportion in the cortex, display increased cortex thickness, and exhibit short-term memory deficit analyzed by the novel-object recognition assay. Last, we identify altered expression of fragile X family genes as a potential molecular mechanism for adverse programming of brain development. Collectively, these data demonstrate that poor maternal nutrition from conception is sufficient to cause abnormal brain development and adult memory loss.

Indexed as

Diet, Protein-RestrictedMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMemory, Short-TermNeurogenesisAnimalsApoptosisBrainCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationFemaleMiceNeural Stem CellsDOHaDlow-protein dietmaternal dietneural stem cellsneurogenesis

Identifiers

PMID29941596
PMCPMC6077736
OpenAlexW2810010351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.