Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29941227›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology2018

The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease.

Shu-Fang Huang, Ti-Hsuan Chien, Wen-Liang Fang, Frank Wang, Chun-Yi Tsai, Jun-Te Hsu, Chun-Nan Yeh, Tse-Ching Chen, Ren-Chin Wu, Cheng-Tang Chiu and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shu-Fang HuangDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ti-Hsuan ChienDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelong, Taiwan.
Wen-Liang FangDivision of General Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Frank WangSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
Chun-Yi TsaiDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jun-Te HsuDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chun-Nan YehDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tse-Ching ChenDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ren-Chin WuDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Tang ChiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ta-Sen YehDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address: tsy471027@adm.cgmh.org.tw.
Chang Gung University · TWCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUKeelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 8th edition of AJCC gastric cancer pathological staging system (AJCC8) derived from the IGCA database needs an external validated in cohorts with higher proportion of advanced disease. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 5386 gastric cancer patients treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) and Veteran General Hospital in Taipei (TVGH) were enrolled. Clinicopathological data of the IGCA series and the CGMH/TVGH cohort were compared. Cumulative survival curves of the CGMH/TVGH cohort as stratified by the AJCC7 and the AJCC8 were compared. Lymph node ratio (LNR) was analyzed in patients with N3b disease.

resultsPatients in the CGMH/TVGH cohort were older and had more advanced tumor stage (stage III, 49% versus 26%, p < 0.001) than those in the IGCA cohort. The median survival of stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC as defined by the AJCC 8 were 49, 27 and 15 months, respectively, with narrower 95% confidence intervals, in comparison with 62, 30 and 18 months, respectively, as defined by the AJCC7. The AJCC8 exhibited better homogeneity within stages and discriminatory ability between stages, compared to the AJCC7. Six hundred and four patients with N3b disease were stratified by LNR into three subgroups, and their median survival were 31, 17, and 11 months, respectively (p < 0.001). LNR further appeared as a powerful outcome predictor of N3b disease (HR, 3.1).

conclusionThe AJCC8 performs well in patients with high proportion of advanced gastric cancer. We recommend that LNR is a supplementary prognostic indicator for N3b disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsAJCC8Gastric cancer pathological staging classification

Identifiers

PMID29941227
OpenAlexW2808455920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.