ArticleJournal of ovarian research2018
Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ovarian clear cell carcinoma: open questions on the management and treatment algorithm.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Effect of endometriosis on prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a 10-year retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Endometriosis and epithelial ovarian cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Correlation of clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between endometriosis-associated and primary ovarian cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- A preoperative nomogram incorporating CT to predict the probability of ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Ovarian clear cell carcinoma with or without endometriosis origin in a single institution cohort.Discover oncology · 2023Article
- Advanced Stage Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma Mimicking Uterine Sarcoma Without Gross Residual Tumor During Primary Surgery: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2023Article
- A comprehensive survey into the role of microRNAs in ovarian cancer chemoresistance; an updated overview.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Review
- Tumor Size Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,000 Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConsidered as the precursor lesion of a subset of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), the prognostic role of endometriosis in OCCC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of coexisting endometriosis in the survival of patients with OCCC, and also sought to identify other prognostic factors.
resultsA total of 125 patients were diagnosed with OCCC during the study period. Of these, 55 (44.0%) patients had coexisting endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were younger (p = 0.030), had smaller tumor diameter (p = 0.005) and lower preoperative CA125 levels (p = 0.005). More patients with endometriosis had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease (83.6% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.000) and exhibited sensitivity to platinum-based regimen (89.6% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.003). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that coexisting endometriosis was not a predictor of 5-year overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of OCCC patients. For OS, chemosensitivity was the only useful prognostic factor (Hazards ratio (HR) 109.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23.46-511.51; p = 0.000). For PFS, the useful prognostic factors were ascites (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.21-6.47; p = 0.016), FIGO stage (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04-2.49; p = 0.033), and chemosensitivity (HR 101.60, 95% CI 29.45-350.49; p = 0.000). Moreover, higher FIGO stage was the only risk factor for resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy (Exp (B) = 0.292, 95% CI 0.123-0.693; p = 0.005).
conclusionsIn this study, coexisting endometriosis was not a prognostic factor for the survival of OCCC patients. The most important predictor of both 5-year OS and PFS was chemosensitivity to platinum-based regimen, which decreased significantly with increase in FIGO stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.