Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29941050›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

In vitro activity of fluralaner and commonly used acaricides against Dermanyssus gallinae isolates from Europe and Brazil.

Emmanuel Thomas, Hartmut Zoller, Gabriele Liebisch, Luis Francisco Angeli Alves, Luis Vettorato, Rafael M Chiummo, Annie Sigognault-Flochlay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Long-term efficacy of fluralaner (ExzoltParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel ThomasMSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Zur Propstei, 55270, Schwabenheim, Germany. emmanuel.thomas@msd.de.
Hartmut ZollerMSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Zur Propstei, 55270, Schwabenheim, Germany.
Gabriele LiebischZeckLab, Up'n Kampe 3, 30938, Burgwedel, Germany.
Luis Francisco Angeli AlvesState University of Western Paraná (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, PR, Brazil.
Luis VettoratoMSD Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael M ChiummoMSD Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Annie Sigognault-FlochlayMerck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ, 07940, USA.
Microsoft (Brazil) · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae negatively impacts bird welfare and health, and interferes with egg production and quality, while emerging acaricide resistance limits control options. Fluralaner, a novel miticide for administration in drinking water, is approved for control of D. gallinae infestations. Mite sensitivity testing is relevant to gauge field isolate susceptibility to available treatments.

methodsThirteen D. gallinae isolates collected during 2014 through 2016 from farms in Germany, France, Spain and Brazil, and a 2001 laboratory-maintained isolate were used for acaricide contact sensitivity testing. Tested compounds were cypermethrin, deltamethrin, phoxim, propoxur, and the recently available acaricides, spinosad and fluralaner. In each study, at least one isolate was exposed to increasing concentrations of at least one acaricide. In one study, additional testing determined the sensitivity of the 2001 isolate to fluralaner using a mite-feeding test, and of fluralaner, phoxim and spinosad using an immersion test. At least two replicates were used for each dilution. Vehicle and untreated controls were also included.

resultsBased on 90% mortality (LC

conclusionsContact sensitivity testing indicated apparent resistance to at least one of phoxim, deltamethrin, cypermethrin and propoxur in 13 field isolates from Europe and Brazil. All isolates were highly susceptible to fluralaner. Fluralaner was approximately 1000 times more active by feeding than by contact. Fluralaner's distinct mode of action and efficacy against isolates largely refractory to those acaricides, makes it a promising option for the control of D. gallinae infestations of poultry.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAnimalsBrazilEuropeIsoxazolesMitesNitrilesPyrethrinsA1443 compoundAcaricidescypermethrindecamethrinIsoxazolesNitrilesPyrethrinsContact toxicityCypermethrinDeltamethrinDermanyssus gallinaeFeedingFluralanerImmersionPhoximPropoxurSpinosad

Identifiers

PMID29941050
PMCPMC6019301
OpenAlexW2809718716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.