SynthesisImplementation science : IS2018
Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing the effectiveness of healthy weight interventions in the early years of childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from high-income countries.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Pooled it
- From legalisation to practice: implementation of newly legalised health interventions in healthcare settings - a systematic review.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of animal-assisted services for school-aged children: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- A Guideline for Contextual Adaptation of Community-Based Health Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Guideline
- Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- Do manual therapies have a specific autonomic effect? An overview of systematic reviews.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Experiences of general practice teams and their patients with clinical research-a mixed-methods process evaluation of the Bavarian Research Practice Network (BayFoNet).BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- The PIECES multi-site comparative case study protocol: mixed methods implementation evaluation of adapting, implementing and tailoring primary cancer prevention programmes in diverse contexts.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators for optimal perinatal primary care in low-risk pregnancies: an interview study with parents and healthcare professionals.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Exploring The Fidelity of Resistance Training Interventions in Regional, Rural, And Remote Cancer Care: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Understanding the need and feasibility of a transitional care training program for family caregivers of geriatric stroke survivors.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Equity considerations when making decisions to scale-up health interventions: a review and analysis of scalability assessment resources.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Capitalisation as a boundary object in intervention research, serving knowledge production and mobilisation.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Co-Development of an Evidence-Based Breastfeeding Support Intervention, Optimised for Delivery in Healthcare Settings, and Adaptations for Mothers With Long-Term Conditions: The Action for Breastfeeding (A4B) Programme.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- Digital maturity index instrument development for primary health care in Indonesia: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Unfolding Success Factors and Barriers in Adapting Slovenia's Health Promotion Centre Model to Bergamo Province: A PIET-T Feasibility Assessment with Time-Dependent Care Implications.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implementation and evaluation of a peer-to-peer support program in oncology: study protocol for the PaRole Onco France model.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Population and health system factors affecting the transferability of health kiosks in markets in Kenya.International health · 2026Article
- Key functions for the transferability of a French school-based health promotion intervention.PloS one · 2026Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproving the public's health in different countries requires the consideration of diverse health care systems and settings. For evidence-based public health, decision-makers need to consider the transferability of effective health interventions from a primary context to their specific target context. The aim of this systematic review was to develop a model for the assessment of transferability of health interventions through identification and systematization of influencing criteria, including facilitators and barriers.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Articles were eligible if they were published in English or German and provided a description of transferability criteria. Included articles were ranked based on their thematic relevance and methodological support of transferability criteria. Using a qualitative approach, a thematic synthesis was conducted.
resultsThirty-seven articles were included in the review. The thematic synthesis revealed 44 criteria, covered by 4 overarching themes, which influence transferability of health interventions: The population (P), the intervention (I), and the environment (E) represent 30 conditional transferability criteria, and the transfer of the intervention (T) represents 14 process criteria for transferring the intervention to the target context. Transferability (-T) depends on the dynamic interaction of conditional criteria in the primary and target context as well as on the process of transfer. The description of facilitators and barriers deepens the understanding of the criteria. The synthesis resulted in two related models: the conceptual PIET-T model explains the underlying mechanism of transferability of health interventions and the PIET-T process model provides practical guidance for a transferability assessment.
conclusionsTransferability of health interventions is a complex concept, which needs systematic consideration of the primary and target context. It should be anticipated before and evaluated after an intervention is implemented in the target context. Therefore, decision-makers need systematic and practically relevant knowledge on transferability. The synthesized PIET-T conceptual and process models with systematized criteria, facilitators, and barriers are intended as a theoretical basis to determine transferability of health interventions. Further research is needed to develop a practical tool for the PIET-T models and to evaluate the tool's usefulness for decision-making processes and intervention transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.